Page 20 - EPSI Magazine Issue 8 final 2018.indd
P. 20

17





          of 4%. The current rate of new connections is a mere    c) Stimulating Energy Consumption on the Grid
          100,000 and the population growth rate higher than
          the 4.0%. And Ministry of Energy projections indicate       Government  must  proactively  wean  the
          that 3.17 million households will be connected via      communities off biomass especially for cooking
          the off-grid proposals promoted by the Rural Elec-      starting with urban and peri-urban areas. Elec-
          trification Agency, while another 3.95 million will be   tricity efficient cookers must be promoted and
          connected through grid extension and user densifi-      supply lines for them set up with government
          cation.                                                 intervention as anything else will eventually
              The government’s Electricity Connection Policy      contribute to environment degradation. There
          approved in August 2018 by Cabinet, seeks to bring      was a time when households were actively en-
          electricity to individual homesteads for free provid-   couraged to use electricity for cooking and oth-
          ed the owner can do internal house wiring or accept     er domestic chores through incentives.  There
          on-board connected supply. Unless this initiative is    are countries that have adopted this and it has
          augmented by other government action, is doomed         increased their match to universal access while
          to fail like others before. Both the first and second   protecting their environments.
          versions of Energy for Rural Transformation failed not
          for lack of funds (which were corruptly misused) but        Government must take lead in dealing with
          because  electricity and  cook stoves  by themselves    electricity prices, through cheaper installations
          do not significantly change communities.                of the supply lines but also by dealing with the
                                                                  rather high cost of generation.
              In countries where near universal modern ener-
          gy access has been achieved, electricity access was         The price of re-negotiating the current “take
          part of a more holistic programme including initia-     or pay” power purchase agreements entered
          tives in economic empowerment and targeting pro-        into when attracting investments in generation
          ductive use in cottage industries and enhanced com-     was crucial, will mitigate the higher cost in envi-
          munity  based  commercial  activities.  The  following   ronmental damage.
          suggestions might be worth examining if we are to
          conserve the environment in Uganda:


          a) Expansion of the Grid Network

              The expansion of the grid network cannot be
          left in the hands of the costly private sector. It might
          be prudent to exploit the provisions of the coun-
          try’s Public Private Partnership Act to engage private
          sector including Umeme Uganda Limited in a more
          elaborate grid extension to the households. Umeme
          alone has neither the capital required nor the ap-
          petite to invest long term in the currently unserved           By Dr. Frank B. Sebbowa
          communities. Even if it had the cost involved would
          be way too high for sustainability of the programme.

          b) Development of the Intermediate Off-Grid Supply


              The short to medium term for unserved commu-
          nities would be developing off-grid supply systems
          with serious productive use appendages. This way
          one raises the community livelihoods to consume
          grid electricity with less likelihood of early discon-
          nections when it eventually arrives.
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25