Page 320 - Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Getty Museum Conservation, By David Scott
P. 320

the light blue corrosion products  mentioned earlier, was characterized  as sodium acetate trihy-
           drate, CH 3 COONa-3H 2 0. The source of the  acetic  acid was clearly from  the display and  stor­
           age  materials  being used in the  Burrell  Collection. The  source of the  sodium  is  more  prob­
           lematic. Sodium acetate trihydrate crystals were previously observed  on the interior surface of
          wooden drawers  covered with glass. The presence of sodium in conjunction with bronzes may
           be associated with previous conservation treatments  or with sodium-containing corrosion prod­
           ucts, either of which is quite possible, especially with ancient Egyptian bronzes. A similar Egyp­
           tian  tripod  vessel,  conserved  at  the  Institute of Archaeology, London, in 1982-83,  was  found
           to have light  blue  corrosion patches that were  identified as  chalconatronite  by X-ray  diffrac­
           tion. The data obtained were  so detailed that more lines were determined than reported in the
           ICDD  file 22-1458. This tripod had been conserved  before  1982 with the sodium sesquicarbonate
           method. This appears to be another  example of chalconatronite  occurrence  as a consequence of
           conservation that was  first mentioned by Horie and Vint in 1982.


       C O N S E R V A T I O N  T R E A T M E N T S

           In  1948 a virulent outbreak  of corrosion  attacked  bronzes  from  the  Fitzwilliam  Museum in
           Cambridge, England. These bronzes had been in long-term storage, packed in (probably moist)
          wood  shavings,  in  caves in Wales  during World  War I.  Evans  (i95i)  studied  these bronzes
                                                       I
           and  was  convinced that  acetic  acid released from  the wood shavings  had  corroded  them by a
           mechanism  analogous to basic lead carbonate formation on lead objects  exposed  to acetic acid;
           this turned  out to be  an  astute observation. A detailed  account  of the  Evans study  is given in
           Dawson  (i988).
              Evans devised  a localized electrochemical  treatment  procedure  for the  objects:  an incon­
           spicuous  area of bare metal was exposed  by scraping and was attached  by a wire to the positive
           terminal of a milliammeter. A zinc nib, cut from  sheet, was  attached  to the  negative terminal.
          The nib was dipped in a dilute hydrochloric acid solution (1 HCl : 3  H 2 0 ) and applied to the cor­
           rosion spot. This created  a circuit, and the milliammeter registered  a current rise  as the corro­
           sion was dissolved. When no further increase was recorded,  excess acid was blotted away, and
           the procedure  was repeated with the nib dipped next in syrupy phosphoric  acid and  finally in a
           20%  (w/v) aqueous solution of sodium  carbonate.  No external  source of electric current  was
          used for this treatment. The Evans technique  forms a circuit drawing chloride ions away  from
           the  object,  and  the chloride ions  are  dissolved by the hydrochloric acid. Next, the  phosphoric
           acid precipitates  relatively insoluble copper  phosphates, and the sodium carbonate  neutralizes
           any remaining acid on the  object.
              Although relatively successful,  the Evans method was never used outside of Cambridge. It
          was certainly preferable  to total electrolytic reduction, which was  still extensively in vogue in
           Europe  at the time. This treatment  reduced many important bronzes to shapeless lumps of bare




                                                  T H E  ORGANI C  SALT S  O F  C O P P E R
                                                                     303
   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325