Page 117 - Chinese and Asian Ceramics from an Indonesian Collection
P. 117

Ceramics from the Musi River


         the 11th–12th century, after which the Vajrayana religion
         began to decline in Indonesia.

         CHINA
         Some of the unglazed pottery found in the Musi was
         probably from China. These included fine red terracotta
         polished plate (K2024) which had a low foot ring with a
         bi-disc base similar to certain glazed plates made during
         the Tang Dynasty. Several other Majapahit-style kendis
         (K1506, K2498, K2577, K2591) may also have been made
         in South China. They were similar to lightly glazed kendis
         (K2538, K2544) possibly made during the Southern Song
         Period in Fujian Province. One kendi (Figure 192) had
         very fine incised decoration on the body not encountered
         by us in similar Majapahit kendis. Another kendi (Figure
         193) was of a primitive design and decorated with both
         paddle striations and an unfamiliar collar of streaky thin
         angled lines radiating from the base of the broad neck
         to the shoulder.
            Several other unglazed vessels from the Musi were
         made in South China during the Late-Song period.
         These included three storage jars [K1008–9, K1074, see
         Chapter 6: Storage Jars page 113] and K1022, which
         had a high-fired grey body.                         Figure 195.  Two-spouted kendi, height 26.4 cm. A beautiful
                                                                      balanced example of the skill of Lampung potters,
                                                                      involving carved, incised, punctate and painted
         INDIA                                                        slip patterns. Heirloom piece from Lampung
         Hundred of pottery fragments attributable to Indian          collected in Jakarta in 1998, probably C19–C20.
         Fine Ware have been excavated from Sembiran, on the          Catalogue No K33.
         north coast of Bali (Ardika 1994, Ardika et al. 1991). Most
         were roulette/chattered decorated dishes (including
         coarser paste copies), but also a stamped bowl, a plain   and Sembiran (Bali) probably came directly from the
         bowl  and  a  dish  with  a  stamped  base.  Bouvet  (2012)   Bay of Bengal.
         investigated other sites in South East Asia for Indian   Bouvet (2012: 292) also noted that a dish decorated
         Fine Ware, and documented a further eight sites with   with roulette dated from the 1st centuries of the first
         Fine Ware, characterised by very fine, compact and finely   millennium was found near the Musi River at Palembang.
         micaceous paste. These are the Thai Peninsular sites of:   But comments that there was no photograph or
         Khao Sam Kaeo, Phu Khao Thong, Bang Kluay Nok, Wat   publication to verify this information, which was derived
         Pathumtharam, Tha Chana and the caves of Tham Tuay   from an Indonesian cultural website and published by
         sites in Thailand, all of which are contemporary (4th   Schenk (2006). While we were unable to confirm the
         century BC to 2nd century AD). And Batujaya in West   existence of early-Indian roulette ware in the Musi we
         Java, which is more recent (1st century to end of the 4th   did collect from there a finely potted black burnished
         century or beginning 5th century). In addition to fine   bowl with a convex base (Figure 194). This bowl was
         ware at Batujaya, Manguin and Augustijanto (2011) also   decorated with roulette/chattered triangular marks on
         found shards of crude local copies of the earlier fine ware.   five neck shoulder carinations. It was produced in India
         Bronson and Dales (1972: 42) also noted that the site of   during the Medieval period (5th to 15th century). Dr
         Chansen in Central Thailand had domestic pottery which   Heidrun Schenk examined its photo and considered it
         dated from the start of the 1st millennium to mid way   (pers.comm.) to be a cooking pot typical of those found
         through the 3rd century. They noted that this domestic   Tissamaharama in the southern Province of Sri Lanka
         pottery ‘looks more Indian than South East Asian’.  and South Asia. Further, she stated that such carinated
            Bouvet (2012) was unable to confirm the discovery   cooking pots do not appear before around 800… and that
         of a fragment of a dish decorated with roulette from   they are a …. distinctly medieval development. She also
         Beikthano, Burma, mentioned by Aung Thaw (1968).    saw shards of similar vessels in archaeological excavations
         Although she considers that a surface shard from Phú-  in Bali (pers. comm.).
         C’u, Quáng-ngâi Province, South Vietnam, is possibly a   Interestingly Dr Schenk noted that Wheeler  et al.
         dish decorated with roulette. Bouvet (2012) speculated   (1946) does classify cooking pots similar to K2306 as
         that Phu Khao Thong was a transit warehouse port for   Roulette Ware from Arikamedu and provided it a Roman
         Indian Fine Wares, which were then re-distributed  to   date. However, as pointed out by Schenk (2006) not all
         Peninsular Thailand. While those at Batujaya (West Java)   pottery from Arikamedu was from the Roman era, which
                                                             has led to incorrect postings of the dates for some pottery

          100
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122