Page 35 - Chinese and Asian Ceramics from an Indonesian Collection
P. 35

Ceramics from the Musi River



         southeastern Taiwan, Philippines, Sarawak, central and   as spices, aromatics, beads and woods, often incorrectly
         southern Vietnam, central and southern Thailand, and   attributed to India, which was an international entrepôt
         eastern Cambodia. Other Taiwanese nephrite artefacts,   for these products (Chew 2014). The magnitude of this
         especially beads and bracelets, were distributed much   early maritime trade was considerable and was frequently
         earlier during Neolithic times (1800 BC) from Taiwan   plied by large efficient sailing vessels. Some Greco-Roman
         into the Philippines. In addition to the Fengtian earrings,   merchants in the 1st century BC described huge non-
         the Thai-Malay Peninsula, Vietnam, Philippines, Borneo   Indian ships coming from the east with rich cargoes,
         and Eastern Indonesia were part of a South China Sea   possibly  from  the  Malay  Archipelago.  ‘This  would
         network which traded in a variety of other goods from 500   indicate that the Malay participated actively in Indian
         BC to 200 AD. These included glass beads, carnelian and   Ocean trade, and likely handled much of the traffic
         gold ornaments, ‘Dong Son’ bronze drums; Han bronze   between Southeast Asia and India (https://en.wikipedia.
         mirrors and Sa-Huynh/Kalanay style ceramics (Favereau   org/wiki/History_of_Kedah)’. For example, Indian ships
         and Bellina 2016).                                  sailing between South Asia, Ceylon and China, weighed
            Stark (2006) provides an excellent overview of the   up to 75 tons and could carry up to 200 persons (Wheatley
         development  of  interactions  between  South  East  Asia   1964). It is of note that there was a land route from
         and South Asia. Briefly, she considered that from the   South Asia to the western edge of the Mekong Delta,
         2nd  century  BC  to  the  4th  century AD  there  was  an   but it is unlikely that most ceramics were transported
         increase in the volume of trade and more ‘regularized   along this route because of their bulk and fragility. The
         commodity circulation’. From the 4th century to about   voyages of commercial discovery by the Portuguese and
         the 8th century there was more ideological contact from   the Spanish in the 15th century seeking a reliable route
         South Asia which parallels the rise of the Indian Gupta   to the East for its spices are a continuation of this global
         civilization. Manguin (2002) considers that Indian culture   trade (Chew 2014).
         may have significantly influenced local religions and   Among the huge deposits of ceramics found at a
         state formation processes a little earlier, namely the 3rd   number of sites beneath the Musi River bed are a wide
         century, at the earliest. After the 8th century there was a   variety of trade wares from North Vietnam, Thailand,
         both ideological and economic change coincident with   China as well as a few from the Middle East. While most
         political transformations throughout the region associated   of the glazed wares are readily identifiable, this is not
         with the onset of Thailand’s Dvaravati culture. During   the case with the terracotta, which includes pottery
         the Dvaravati period the focus of trading was to island   from China, central and southern Thailand, the broader
         Southeast Asia, and particularly toward Buddhist Sriwijaya   Mekong Delta region, Central Vietnam and Philippines.
         in southern Sumatra (Manguin 2004).                 Some of these terracotta forms are South East Asian folk
            Stark (2006)  writes that generally South East Asia   ware but others are much older and probably pre-date
         polities of the 1st millennium BC, although influenced   establishment  of the Sriwijaya Kingdom.  There are a
         by events in India and China, established the template   number of potential polities outside southern Sumatra that
         for subsequent ‘classical civilizations’ (Bagan/Pagan,   may have exported ceramics to the Musi River settlements
         Sukothai, Angkor, Nam Viet) that emerged in the 9th   before and during Sriwijaya. The most notable of these
         through to the 14th century. And share close historical   are briefly discussed below.
         links  with  the  region’s  contemporary  nation-states.
         Bronson and Dales (1973) would support this view based   SIGNIFICANT CIVILIZATIONS AND EARLY POLITIES
         on excavations at Chasen, in Central Thailand, when they   IN SOUTH-EAST ASIA
         proposed that most early Indianized town sites in South   Chew (2014) and Mason (2014) described the size and
         East Asia were probably built on Metal Age foundations   scale of the polities in South-East  Asia (archipelago,
         in already long-established towns. Further evidence for   peninsula and mainland sites) in the 1st millennium.
         this view is provided at a number of other sites excavated   Some of these polities had urban centres with around
         more recently.                                      100,000  people,  located  on  300–800  hectares  of  land
            During the early years, trade in South East Asia   surrounded by moats and ramparts. These polities were
         was focused on the west and east coast of the Malayan   complex, mature, urban societies and vibrant centres
         Peninsula and central and central western Thailand.   of production and commerce. They were comparable
         Until very recently, it was thought that much of this trade   in scale to contemporary cities in Egypt and Southern
         was driven by the need of southern Asians for commercial   Mesopotamia.
         tin, which found throughout much of South East Asia   The South East Asian polities played a critical role
         (Bronson 1992). This tin was used by them to produce   in this long distance maritime trade between China and
         their high-tin bronzes. The Bay of Bengal was pivotal   India from the 1st to 8th–10th centuries, depending on
         in this trade such that by the 2nd century BC a number   the polity. However, Manguin (2004) defines their role
         of entrepôt were recorded along the eastern coast of   during the 4th century as particularly important. Despite
         India (Ray 1997 in Stark 2006). In addition to trade in   this, China clearly played a dominant role in these trade
         tin and gold it is now clear that the Kedah Kingdom on   relationships  and  received  tribute  from  these  polities
         the west coast of Malaysia, also provided much of the   as far back as the 2nd century. For example, during the
         world’s supply of high quality iron (Saidin 2016), as well   Tang Dynasty alone Wang (1957, 1989) counted 64 tribute

          18
          18
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40