Page 85 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 85

The Necessity of Intervening Events
    be distinguished. The translation takes place in a moment.
    The translation relates only to believers, and it leaves unbe­
    lievers exactly as they were before. The translation of the
    church has no relation to promises of the land of Israel. The
    Ezekiel judgment has the promises of possession of the prom­
    ised land as a primary objective—determining those quahhe
    for entrance. The translation of the church is followed by
    arrival in heaven. The believers of Ezekiel 20 enter the l^P ’
    not heaven, in bodies of flesh, not immortal bodies, t
    translation concerns Jewish and Gentile believers alike. A
    judgment has to do only with Israel.       . e
       It should be further evident that if the translation o
    church took place simultaneously with the Second y^<^VC^toth
    establish the kingdom, the Ezekiel judgment would be
    impossible and unnecessary as the separation of believers e
    unbelievers would have already taken place. It may there
    be concluded from the nature of the judgment of Israel th
    interval is required between the translation of the churc
    the judgment of Israel during which a new generation
    raelites who believe in Christ as Savior and Messiah to
    into being and is waiting for His second advent to the ear
    establish the millennial kingdom.
              The Judgment of the Gentiles   . jg-
       A similar conclusion is reached by the study of
    ment of the Gentiles described in Matthew 25:31-46-
    the Ezekiel passage and the Matthew passage
    whole population of the earth at the second coming of othc^
    in view. If all Israelites are dealt with in Ezekiel, all   o
    described as the “nations” or the Gentiles are in the M
    judgment. In the Matthew passage, like that of Ezekie
    men tion   is   made   of   eithe r   resurre cti on   or   tran slatio n,   a
    mention is made of either resurrection or translation, a .
    both are often read into the passage by posttribu a   • gl
    desiring to combine all the passages.
       The separation of Matthew 25 is similar to that o
                         89
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90