Page 193 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 193

So I also had my personal physician, Dr. Glazer, set up visits with four
                      other experts on this particular disease.

                         The first call was with the head of thoracic surgery at a major cancer
                      hospital.  She  explained  that  my  condition  had  advanced  quickly  and
                      that, contrary to what the first physician said, there was a surgery that
                      could cure me. It would involve removing both my esophagus and my
                      stomach  and  attaching  my  intestines  to  the  remaining  little  bit  of  my
                      esophagus I’d have left. She estimated I’d have a 10 percent chance of
                      dying  on  the  operating  table  and  a  70  percent  chance  of  a  crippling
                      outcome.  But  the  odds  were  in  favor  of  my  living,  so  her
                      recommendation was clearly worth taking seriously. Naturally I wanted
                      her  to  speak  with  the  doctor  from  Johns  Hopkins  who  originally
                      diagnosed  me  and  recommended  a  watch-and-wait  approach,  so  right
                      then and there I called the other doctor to see what each would say about
                      the other’s views. This was eye-opening. While the two doctors had told
                      me completely different things when I met with them in person, when
                      they  were  on  the  phone  together,  they  sought  to  minimize  their
                      disagreement  and  make  the  other  look  good,  putting  professional
                      courtesy ahead of thrashing things out to get at the best answer. Still, the
                      differences in their views were clear, and listening to them deepened my
                      understanding.

                         The next day I met with a third doctor who was a world-renowned
                      specialist and researcher at another esteemed hospital. He told me that
                      my condition would basically cause me no problems so long as I came
                      in for an endoscopic examination every three months. He explained that
                      it was like skin cancer but on the inside—if it was watched and any new
                      growth was clipped before it metastasized into the bloodstream, I’d be
                      okay. According to him, the results for patients monitored in this way
                      were no different than for those who had their esophagus removed. To
                      put that plainly: They didn’t die from cancer. Life went on as normal for
                      them except for those occasional examinations and procedures.

                         To  recap:  Over  the  course  of  forty-eight  hours,  I  had  gone  from  a
                      likely  death  sentence  to  a  likely  cure  that  would  essentially  involve
                      disemboweling  me,  and  then  finally  to  a  simple,  and  only  slightly
                      inconvenient,  way  of  watching  for  abnormalities  and  removing  them
                      before they could cause any harm. Was this doctor wrong?

                         Dr. Glazer and I went on to meet two other world-class specialists
                      and they both agreed that undergoing the scoping procedure would do
                      no harm, so I decided to go ahead with it. During the procedure, they
                      clipped some tissue from my esophagus and sent it to the laboratory for
                      testing. A few days after the procedure, exactly a week before my sixty-
                      fourth birthday, I got the results. They were shocking to say the least.
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198