Page 242 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 242

Remember  that  computers  have  no  common  sense.  For
                       example,  a  computer  could  easily  misconstrue  the  fact  that
                       people  wake  up  in  the  morning  and  then  eat  breakfast  to

                       indicate that waking up makes people hungry. I’d rather have
                       fewer  bets  (ideally  uncorrelated  ones)  in  which  I  am  highly
                       confident  than  more  bets  I’m  less  confident  in,  and  would
                       consider it intolerable if I couldn’t argue the logic behind any
                       of  my  decisions.  A  lot  of  people  vest  their  blind  faith  in
                       machine  learning  because  they  find  it  much  easier  than
                       developing  deep  understanding.  For  me,  that  deep

                       understanding is essential, especially for what I do.

                          I don’t mean to imply that these mimicking or data-mining
                       systems, as I call them, are useless. In fact, I believe that they
                       can  be  extremely  useful  in  making  decisions  in  which  the
                       future  range  and  configuration  of  events  are  the  same  as
                       they’ve been in the past. Given enough computing power, all
                       possible  variables  can  be  taken  into  consideration.  For

                       example, by analyzing data about the moves that great chess
                       players  have  made  under  certain  circumstances,  or  the
                       procedures  great  surgeons  have  used  during  certain  types  of
                       operations, valuable programs can be created for chess playing
                       or  surgery.  Back  in  1997,  the  computer  program  Deep  Blue
                       beat Garry Kasparov, the world’s highest-ranked chess player,

                       using just this approach. But this approach fails in cases where
                       the future is different from the past and you don’t know the
                       cause-effect relationships well enough to recognize them all.
                       Understanding these relationships as I do has saved me from
                       making mistakes when others did, most obviously in the 2008
                       financial crisis. Nearly everyone else assumed that the future
                       would be similar to the past. Focusing strictly on the logical

                       cause-effect  relationships  was  what  allowed  us  to  see  what
                       was really going on.

                          When  you  get  down  to  it,  our  brains  are  essentially
                       computers that are programmed in certain ways, take in data,
                       and spit out instructions. We can program the logic in both the
                       computer that is our mind and the computer that is our tool so
                       that they can work together and even double-check each other.

                       Doing that is fabulous.
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247