Page 409 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 409

about  a  case  in  which  we  initially  failed  to  maintain
                       excellence, then perceived the problem, got at its root causes,
                       designed  changes,  and  pushed  those  changes  through  to

                       produce excellent results.

                          When  I  started  Bridgewater,  I  was  responsible  for
                       everything. I made the company’s investment decisions and its
                       management  decisions  and  then  I  built  the  organization  to
                       support me and eventually to carry on excellently without me.
                       As Bridgewater grew, the standard I set was uncompromising
                       and straightforward: The analysis we provide to clients should

                       always be of the same quality it would be if I did it myself.
                       That’s because when clients ask what “we” think, they aren’t
                       asking what just anyone thinks—they want to know what I and
                       the  other  CIOs,  who  are  in  charge  of  our  investments,  are
                       thinking.  To  achieve  that  goal,  Bridgewater’s  Client  Service
                       Department either handles the questions they get from clients
                       themselves or passes them on to people with various levels of

                       expertise who are assigned to answer questions based on their
                       level of difficulty. The client advisor (who is a knowledgeable
                       professional designed to be the interface between Bridgewater
                       and the client) has to understand the questions well enough to
                       know who they should be routed to, and they need to review
                       the answers before they go back to the client to ensure they are

                       excellent.  To  be  certain  that  always  happens,  I  created  a
                       checks-and-balances  system  in  which  some  of  our  best
                       investment  thinkers  both  draft  memos  to  clients  themselves
                       and  quality-control  their  colleagues’  work,  grading  it  to
                       provide traceable metrics that can be followed to monitor how
                       well things are going and make changes as needed.


                          In 2011, as a part of my management transition, I handed
                       the oversight of this process to others, and several months later
                       one  of  the  people  in  the  Client  Service  Department  began
                       noticing problems. It started with one memo, which two senior
                       investment advisors noticed had gone out the door to a client
                       even  though  it  contained  errors.  Though  these  were  minor
                       errors, they were important errors to me. With my prodding,
                       the new  management team began investigating other memos

                       and discovered that this poorly prepared memo wasn’t just a
                       one-off; it was symptomatic of a more widespread breakdown
   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414