Page 433 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 433

A good guardrail typically takes the form of a team member whose strengths compensate for
                    the  weaknesses  of  the  team  member  who  needs  to  be  guardrailed.  A  good  guardrailing
                    relationship should be firm without being overly rigid. Ideally, it should work like two people
                    dancing—they’re literally pushing against each other, but with a lot of mutual give-and-take. Of
                    course, having someone in a job who needs to be guardrailed is not as good as having someone in
                    a job who will naturally do the right things. Strive for that.
                    a. Don’t expect people to recognize and compensate for their own blind spots. I constantly see people form wrong
                    opinions and make bad decisions, even though they’ve made the same kinds of mistakes before—
                    and even though they know that doing so is illogical and harmful. I used to think that they would
                    avoid these pitfalls when they became aware of their blind spots, but typically that’s not the case.
                    Only very rarely do I hear someone recuse himself from offering an opinion because they aren’t
                    capable  of  forming  a  good  one  in  a  particular  area.  Don’t  bet  on  people  to  save  themselves;
                    proactively guardrail them or, better yet, put them in roles in which it’s impossible for them to
                    make the types of decisions they shouldn’t make.
                    b.  Consider  the  clover-leaf  design.  In  situations  where  you’re  unable  to  identify  one  excellent
                    Responsible Party for a role (which is always best), find two or three believable people who care
                    deeply about producing excellent results and are willing to argue with each other and escalate
                    their disagreements if necessary. Then set up a design in which they check and balance each other.
                    Though  it’s  not  optimal,  such  a  system  will  have  a  high  probability  of  effectively  sorting  the
                    issues you need to examine and resolve.


                   13.8  Keep  your  strategic  vision  the  same  while  making
                            appropriate tactical changes as circumstances dictate.


                    Bridgewater’s  values  and  strategic  goals  have  been  the  same  since  the  beginning  (to  produce
                    excellent  results,  meaningful  work,  and  meaningful  relationships  through  radical  truth  and
                    transparency) but its people, systems, and tools have changed over forty-plus years as we have
                    grown  from  a  one-person  company  to  a  1,500-person  organization—and  they  can  continue  to
                    change while maintaining values and strategic goals as newer generations replace older ones. That
                    can happen for organizations in much the same way as it happens for families and communities.
                    To help nurture that, it is desirable to reinforce the traditions and reasons for them, as well as to
                    make sure the values and strategic goals are imbued in the successive leaders and the population
                    as a whole.
                    a. Don’t put the expedient ahead of the strategic. People often tell me they can’t deal with the longer-term
                    strategic issues because they have too many pressing issues they need to solve right away. But
                    rushing  into  ad  hoc  solutions  while  kicking  the  proverbial  can  down  the  road  is  a  “path  to
                    slaughter.”  Effective  managers  pay  attention  both  to  imminent  problems  and  to  problems  that
                    haven’t hit them yet. They constantly feel the tug of the strategic path because they worry about
                    not getting to their ultimate goal and they are determined to continue their process of discovery
                    until they do. While they might not have the answer right away, and they might not be able to
                    come up with it by themselves, through a combination of creativity and character they eventually
                    make all the necessary upward loops.

                    b. Think  about  both  the  big  picture  and  the  granular  details,  and  understand  the  connections  between  them.  Avoid
                    fixating on irrelevant details. You have to determine what’s important and what’s unimportant at
                    each level. For example, imagine you are designing a house. First you need to start with the big
                    picture: Your house will sit on a plot of land, and you have to think through where the water
                    comes from, how the house gets hooked up to the power grid, and so on. Then you need to decide
                    how many rooms it will have, where the doors will go, where you need windows, and so on.
                    When designing the plan, you need to think about all of these things and connect them, but that
                    doesn’t mean that you actually need to go out and pick the hinges for the door yourself. You just
                    need to know that you’ll need a door with hinges and how it fits into the bigger picture of the
                    house.
   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438