Page 39 - Malcolm Gladwell - Talking to Strangers
P. 39

Interviewer: In the current game did you find the questions difficult?
                       Philip: Yes, some were. I was like, “Well, what is that?”
                       Interviewer: If you would scale them one to ten, if one was easy and ten was difficult, where do
                         you think you would put them?
                       Philip: I would put them [at] an eight.
                       Interviewer: An eight. Yeah, they’re pretty tricky.
                       Philip is then told that he and his partner did very well on the test. The interviewer asks him why.
                       Philip: Teamwork.

                       Interviewer: Teamwork?
                       Philip: Yeah.
                       Interviewer: OK, all right. Now, I called Rachel out of the room briefly. When she was gone,
                         did you cheat?
                       Philip: I guess. No.

                       Philip slightly mumbles his answer. Then looks away.
                       Interviewer: Are you telling the truth?
                       Philip: Yes.
                       Interviewer: Okay. When I interview your partner and I ask her, what is she going to say?
                       At this point in the tape, there’s an uncomfortable silence, as if the student is trying to get his
                    story straight. “He’s obviously thinking very hard,” Levine said.
                       Philip: No.
                       Interviewer: No?
                       Philip: Yeah.
                       Interviewer: OK, all right. Well, that’s all I need from you.
                       Is  Philip  telling  the  truth?  Levine  has  shown  the  Philip  videotape  to  hundreds  of  people  and
                    nearly every viewer correctly pegs Philip as a cheater. As the “partner” confirmed to Levine, Philip
                    looked inside the answer-filled envelope the minute Rachel left the room. In his exit interview, he
                    lied. And it’s obvious. “He has no conviction,” Levine said.
                       I felt the same thing. In fact, when Philip is asked, “Did you cheat?” and answers, “I guess. No,”
                    I couldn’t contain myself, and I cried out, “Oh, he’s terrible.” Philip was looking away. He was
                    nervous. He couldn’t keep a straight face. When the interviewer followed up with, “Are you telling
                    the truth?” Philip actually paused, as if he had to think about it first.
                       He was easy. But the more tapes we looked at, the harder it got. Here is a second case. Let’s call
                    him Lucas. He was handsome, articulate, confident.
                       Interviewer: I have to ask, when Rachel left the room, did any cheating occur?
                       Lucas: No.
                       Interviewer: No? You telling me the truth?
                       Lucas: Yes, I am.

                       Interviewer: When I interview your partner and I ask her the same question, what do you think
                         she’s going to say?
                       Lucas: Same thing.
                       “Everybody believes him,” Levine said. I believed him. Lucas was lying.
                       Levine and I spent the better part of a morning watching his trivia-quiz videotapes. By the end, I
                    was ready to throw up my hands. I had no idea what to make of anyone.
                       The  point  of  Levine’s  research  was  to  try  to  answer  one  of  the  biggest  puzzles  in  human
                    psychology: why are we so bad at detecting lies? You’d think we’d be good at it. Logic says that it
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44