Page 8 - A Brief Overview of the Research Behind Revibe
P. 8

R E V I B E   T E C H N O L O G I E S ,   I N C .
              STUDY 2                                             U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
                                                                       FUNDED IN PART BY THE



              PART 2: OVERVIEW



              In order to participate, teachers needed to teach students in grades 1-5 and commit
              to using Revibe with at least one student for a period of two weeks. Of the eligible
              and selected participants, 26 teachers participated (Mage = 36 years; 25 female;

              88.5% Caucasian, 3.8% African American, and 7.7% declined to report race/ethnicity;
              1-16+ years of experience, with the average participant reporting about 10 years of
              experience). After consenting to participate, four teachers attrited from the study (two
              reported personal events that prevented them from having the time to participate and
              two were unable to receive parent consent). Teachers were asked to identify at least

              one student to participate in the study with them. In order to participate, students
              needed to be enrolled at a participating school, in grades 1-5, and have parental
              permission to participate. 29 students participated (Mage = 9 years; 23 boys; two 1st
              graders; eight 3rd graders; six 4th graders; thirteen 5th graders; 56.7% identified with
              ADHD diagnosis; 46.7% on medication; 56.7% Caucasian, 23.3% African American,

              10% more than one race, 3.3% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 3.3% declined
              to report race/ethnicity). To ensure that responses were not reflective of practices
              and policies of one school or type of school, five different schools in NC participated
              (two charter, two public, one alternative educational program).


              During the trial, students received personalized prompts over the course of their
              school day and self-recorded on-task vs. off-task behavior by tapping the device
              screen (2x or 1x, respectively). The software tracked the timing and number of
              prompts, self-recorded data, and activity sensor data.  At the end of the trial, students
              provided qualitative comments and quantitative ratings on a Likert-scale in the

              following areas: a) comfort, b) attractive, c) distracting, d) stigmatizing to wear, e)
              ease of use, f) clarity of prompts, g) value for self-monitoring, h) useful for helping
              stay on task, i) would want to continue to use in school, and j) would want to use for
              homework at home.


              Before and after the trial, teachers rated their students’ Activity Level, Attentional
              Focusing, Impulsivity, and Inhibitory Control using the teacher version of the Child
              Behavior Questionnaire-short form (CBQ-S).  Additionally, at the end of the trial,
              teachers rated each component of the Revibe as well as the overall product on a
              Likert-scale in the following areas: a) quality, b) value, c) feasibility, and d) utility.

              Teachers also rated the degree to which they would recommend Revibe to other
              educators and would want to use the product themselves following Phase II full
              development and testing.
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13