Page 20 - MTAA 2019 Federal Election Final _Neat
P. 20

ABOLISH LUXURY CAR TAX

             The luxury car tax (LCT) was
               introduced in 2000 to            “THE LUXURY CAR TAX
               encourage buyers to purchase     IS REDUNDANT AND
               locally manufactured vehicles    DISCRIMINATORY
               instead of imported prestige     TOWARDS MOTOR
               vehicles. The end of passenger   VEHICLE DEALERS AND
               vehicle manufacturing in         CONSUMERS”
               Australia now makes this tax
               redundant.

             LCT is charged at 33 per cent on the proportion of the vehicle
               priced over $66,331 (or $75,526 for vehicles categorised as ‘fuel
               efficient’). These thresholds are absurdly low and affect many
               working vehicles. This includes four-wheel-drive vehicles that meet
               the needs of rural consumers, such as the Mitsubishi Pajero,
               Toyota Land Cruiser and Nissan Patrol. They are all priced above
               the LCT threshold.

             These vehicles are essential for performing transport tasks on
               roads and in conditions that are often unsuitable for regular
               vehicles. This consequently penalise consumers in rural and
               regional communities, who are often the purchasers of such
               vehicles for work purposes.

             The automotive industry strongly believes that the LCT is unfair
               and discriminatory towards motor vehicle dealers and consumers.
               It acts to artificially inflate the price of vehicles that offer the latest
               in safety and emission technologies.

             There is gross inequity given traditional luxury items such as yachts
               planes and high end jewellery which do not attract the same type
               of additional luxury tax.

             The automotive industry recommends that the Federal
               Government act to abolish the luxury car tax. While MTAA
               recognises that the removal of tens of billions of dollars of revenue
               is a concern for government, continuing a discriminatory tax is not
               acceptable.

                                                                19 | P a g e
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25