Page 244 - Area X - H
P. 244

IF U G A O   STATE  UNIVERSITY                                                                  T a b le  o f  R e fe re n c e
                                                                                          PART II
                               PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR HEADS OF DELIVERY/SERVICE UNITS



                This Table o f Reference  for employee performance standards is particularly for heads  o f delivery units and  service units -  the Vice Presidents, the Campus  Executive Directors,
         College  Deans,  and  D epartm ent  Directors.  The  functions  are  based  on  the  duties  and  responsibilities  o f University  Officials  as  provided  in  the  IFSU  Code.  This  shall  be  used  as
         reference in the preparation o f the Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) o f the University Officials.

         Note:  CSC Memorandum Circular No. 6, s. 2012, p.  7 (Guidelines on the Establishment of Agency SPMS) provides that, “Unless the work output of a particular duty has been assigned pre-set standards
         by management, its standards shall be agreed upon by the supervisors and the ratees”. Thus, performance standards for core or support functions performed by employees that are not found in this Table
         of Reference shall be agreed upon by the supervisor and the employee.

            I .   V I C E   P R E S I D E N T S
                A.  COMMON FUNCTIONS
                                                                                                          Performance M easures/Standards in terms of Q uantity, Quality, and Tim eliness
                              Function                                Perform ance Measures
                                                                                                      Quantity               Quality                      Tim eliness

      Managerial      Plan needed programs, projects and activities in line   Submission of OPCR Target on scheduled   5-complete   5-no error   5- (3 or more days before due date)
                      with the university development plan     due date                          1-incomplete       4-with 1 error           4- (1 to 2 days before due date)
                                                                                                                    3-with 2 errors          3- (on due date)
                                                                                                 -completeness of parts   2-with 3 errors    2- (1 to 2 days after due date)
                                                                                                 of OPCR             1-with 4 errors         1- (3 or more days after due date)
                                                                                                                     -follow’ correct format  -deadline o f submission to Planning Office
                      Monitor and evaluate implementation of PPAs  Submission of quarterly reports (OPCR)   5-complete   5-no error          5-3 or more days before due date
                                                               actual on scheduled due date      1-incomplete       4-with 1 error           4-1 to 2 days before due date
                                                                                                                    3-with 2 errors          3-on due date
                                                                                                                    2-with 3 errors          2-1 to 2 days after due date
                                                                                                                     1-with 4 errors         1-3 or more days after due date
                                                                                                                                             -deadline o f submission to Planning Office
                      Design and institute a productive working relationship   Activities proposed and implemented with   Subordinate satisfaction survey
                      between and among constituents           Satisfactory rating from constituents                 rating:
                                                                                                                     5 -  outstanding
                                                               Submission o f result of rating                      4- very satisfactory
                                                                                                                     3-satisfactory
                                                                                                                    2-unsatisfactory
                                                                                                                     1-poor

                      Implement institutional policies, memoranda, orders,   Policies, memo, orders, rules and regulations   Supervisor’s rating:
                      rules and regulations                    properly implemented                                  5 -  outstanding
                                                                                                                    4- very satisfactory
                                                                                                                     3-satisfactory
                                                                                               2
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249