Page 525 - Area X - G

Relevant training hours attended by the faculty and
staff members including attendance to
conferences/trainings
a. International 20 20 20 20 Colleges, HR « v5.
b. Regional/National 20 20 20 20 40 Colleges, HR JTOtf- S
No. of new laboratories/facilities •
% of existing facilities refurbished/ upgraded 70% 70% Infra V f '
% of infrastructure/ facilities granted certification
from evaluating bodies (e.g, building permit, sanitary 25% 25% 25% 25% 50% Infra
permit, etc.) 2£f_ t
% of GAD-attributed PPAs in Higher Education ■d-------
Program, Advanced Education Program, Research
Program, Extension Program, and General 80% 80% GAD
Administration and Support Services (GASS)
implemented
rrly Report Submission:
First Quarter Second Quarter (Semi-Annual Assessmentj Third Quarter Fourth Quarter (Semi-Annual Assessment)

fted by: Submitted by: Submitted by: Submitted by:

JOCELYN TAPO-SALVIEJO JOCELYN TAPO-SALVIEJO JOCELYN TAPO-SALVIEJO j q c e l y n V a p JO
Campus Executive Director Campus Executive Director Campus Executive Director

red: Assessed by: Approved: Assessed by:
EVA MARIE CODAMON-DUGYON. PhD. DIOSDADO M. AQUINO. PhD. EVA MARIE CODAMON-DUGYON. PhD. DIOSDADO M. AQIJI'NO. PhD.
University President Chairperson, PMT University President Chairperson, PMT

Assessed/Final Rating by: Assessed/!

EVA MARIE CODAMON-DUGYON. PhD.
University President
Scale for the Final Scores; Assessment: January to June Rating Scale for the Final Scores: Assessment: July to December
- 5.00 — Outstanding Total Score: 4.51 - 5.00 — Outstanding Total Score: V
- 4.50 — Very Satisfactory 3.51- 4.50 — Very Satisfactory kb S •;
- 3.50 — Satisfactory j Divide by No. of Pis: 2.51- 3.50 — Satisfactory Divide by No. of Pis:
-
- 2 . 5 0 -----Fair 1.51- 2.50 — Fair * 7
-1.50 -----Poor Numerical Rating: 1.00-1.50 — Poor Numerical Rating: ML 1- c l
Adjectival Rating: Adjectival Rating:
o