Page 757 - Area X - G
P. 757

r





                                                                                                                                Seml-Annuai Assessment
                                         Comments and Recommendations fo r lidlviduat Development Purposes
                                                                                                                January to June                       July to December
                                                                                                            Functions      Score  W eighted     Functions      Score  Weighted
                                                                                                                                        2L
                                                                                                     Functions: |»0%)                    I. Functions: («0%1
                                                                              ^7Kr*r'—-            A,  Designation                       A. Designation        of 37  ( W s )
                                                                                                   (OPCR rating)                         (OPCR rating)
                                                                                                     B  Faculty                           3. Faculty
                                  Rating Scale fo r the Final Score                                 Functions                            Functions             4.0     0n
                                  4.51  - 5 . 0 0 ----- Outstanding  (Extraordinary level otachievemert)  EalinsL                        Biting____                           )
                                  3 61  - 4.50  —  Verv Satisfactory (Performance exceeded expectation)   Add  Common Indicators score
                                  2:51  - 3 50  —  Satislactory (Performance mat expectation)                                            Add  Common  Indicators score
                                  1.51  - 2.50  —  Fair (Performance failedto meet expectation)                                             Total Score
                                  1.00 -  1.50  —  Poor (Performance was consistently below expectation)  Total Score                                          1 & J J L
                                                                                                      Divide by. No  of PI                  Divide by  No  of Ft  ik fy v   -
                                                                                                       A s / e r a g e W e ig h t e d  ( 7 0 % ;  A verage/Weighted (70%)
                                                                                                       Student Rating-Weighted"             StudentRa
                                                                                                      Total                                 Total
                                                                                                    (Average-                            (Average-
                                                                                                    Faculty+Stude                        Ficulty+Studen   r r            V   <-K
                                                                                                    nt Rating)                           I Rating)
                                                                                                       Rating for Part I                    Rating for Part I
                                 Note:  % weight allocation for the functions of faculty members shall be based on the existing policies
                                 on faculty workload
                                                                                                    II. Behavioral Indicators 110%)      II. Behavioral Indicators (10S)
                                                                                                       Yofal Score -~§ ehavlora?'           Total Score • behavioral
                                            Instructor  Asst  Prof  Asso.Prof  Prof  Univ  Prof.    Indicators                           Indicators___________________  1 4
                                                                                                                                                       _________
                                                                                                                                            No  of PI
                                 1. Instruction   80%   70%        60%      35%        30%             No. of PI                            Rating tor Pan II (T  Score/  J L jtfL .
                                 2  Research   10%      10%        20%      40%        45%             Rating for Part  II (T. Score/ PI)                             3 =
                                 3. Extension   5%*     10%*       10%*     10%*        10%*        IPCR Rating (90% Part 1+10% Pan      IFCR Rating (90% Part 1+10%
                                  4  Production         5%*        10%*     5%*         5%*         ill                                  Part li)_____________________
                                  6  Others   5%*       5%*        10%*     10%*        10%*        Adjectival Rating                    Adjectival Rating
                                  It  For faculty members with designation. % weight  allocation shall be pro-rated based on approved   Discussed   Dscussed
                                  workload                                                          rating with:                         rding with:
                                                                                                              &48mi]R£J*AUeJl£                     Q£Bt
                                                                                                                   Employee
                                                                                                    Assessed by                          Assessed by:       .
                                                                                                    I certify that I discussed my assessment   I certify that I disci, ssed my assessment
                                                                                                    of the performance wtth the employe*  of the performance with thp employee
                                                                                                                                                                    N3--
                                                                                                             GENEVIEVE L  VAIPEZ. PhD                       5    Iff*, run
                                                                                                               Immediate Supervisor                 Immediate i
                                                                                                    Final rating by                      Fnal rating by:
                                                                                                                                                    CeKAPlN            phC
                                                                                                                Head of Delivery Unit                Head o f  Delv&y Unit

                                                                                                       IFSU-HRD-PMT-F032
                                                                                                       Rev 00(Feb. 04  2BI9)
   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762