Page 757 - Area X - G
P. 757
r
Seml-Annuai Assessment
Comments and Recommendations fo r lidlviduat Development Purposes
January to June July to December
Functions Score W eighted Functions Score Weighted
2L
Functions: |»0%) I. Functions: («0%1
^7Kr*r'—- A, Designation A. Designation of 37 ( W s )
(OPCR rating) (OPCR rating)
B Faculty 3. Faculty
Rating Scale fo r the Final Score Functions Functions 4.0 0n
4.51 - 5 . 0 0 ----- Outstanding (Extraordinary level otachievemert) EalinsL Biting____ )
3 61 - 4.50 — Verv Satisfactory (Performance exceeded expectation) Add Common Indicators score
2:51 - 3 50 — Satislactory (Performance mat expectation) Add Common Indicators score
1.51 - 2.50 — Fair (Performance failedto meet expectation) Total Score
1.00 - 1.50 — Poor (Performance was consistently below expectation) Total Score 1 & J J L
Divide by. No of PI Divide by No of Ft ik fy v -
A s / e r a g e W e ig h t e d ( 7 0 % ; A verage/Weighted (70%)
Student Rating-Weighted" StudentRa
Total Total
(Average- (Average-
Faculty+Stude Ficulty+Studen r r V <-K
nt Rating) I Rating)
Rating for Part I Rating for Part I
Note: % weight allocation for the functions of faculty members shall be based on the existing policies
on faculty workload
II. Behavioral Indicators 110%) II. Behavioral Indicators (10S)
Yofal Score -~§ ehavlora?' Total Score • behavioral
Instructor Asst Prof Asso.Prof Prof Univ Prof. Indicators Indicators___________________ 1 4
_________
No of PI
1. Instruction 80% 70% 60% 35% 30% No. of PI Rating tor Pan II (T Score/ J L jtfL .
2 Research 10% 10% 20% 40% 45% Rating for Part II (T. Score/ PI) 3 =
3. Extension 5%* 10%* 10%* 10%* 10%* IPCR Rating (90% Part 1+10% Pan IFCR Rating (90% Part 1+10%
4 Production 5%* 10%* 5%* 5%* ill Part li)_____________________
6 Others 5%* 5%* 10%* 10%* 10%* Adjectival Rating Adjectival Rating
It For faculty members with designation. % weight allocation shall be pro-rated based on approved Discussed Dscussed
workload rating with: rding with:
&48mi]R£J*AUeJl£ Q£Bt
Employee
Assessed by Assessed by: .
I certify that I discussed my assessment I certify that I disci, ssed my assessment
of the performance wtth the employe* of the performance with thp employee
N3--
GENEVIEVE L VAIPEZ. PhD 5 Iff*, run
Immediate Supervisor Immediate i
Final rating by Fnal rating by:
CeKAPlN phC
Head of Delivery Unit Head o f Delv&y Unit
IFSU-HRD-PMT-F032
Rev 00(Feb. 04 2BI9)