Page 758 - Area X - G
P. 758

r





                                Seml-Annuai Assessment
 Comments and Recommendations fo r lidlviduat Development Purposes
                January to June                      July to December
           Functions       Score  W eighted     Functions      Score  Weighted
                                        2L
    Functions: |»0%)                     I. Functions: («0%1
 ^7Kr*r'—-  A,  Designation              A. Designation        of 37  ( W s )
   (OPCR rating)                         (OPCR rating)
    B  Faculty                            3. Faculty
 Rating Scale fo r the Final Score  Functions  Functions       4.0     0n
 4.51  - 5 . 0 0 ----- Outstanding  (Extraordinary level otachievemert)  EalinsL  Biting____  )
 3 61  - 4.50  —  Verv Satisfactory (Performance exceeded expectation)   Add  Common Indicators score
 2:51  - 3 50  —  Satislactory (Performance mat expectation)  Add  Common  Indicators score
 1.51  - 2.50  —  Fair (Performance failedto meet expectation)  Total Score
 1.00 -  1.50  —  Poor (Performance was consistently below expectation)  Total Score  1 & J J L
      Divide by. No  of PI                 Divide by  No  of Ft  ik fy v   -
      A s / e r a g e W e ig h t e d  ( 7 0 % ;  A verage/Weighted (70%)
      Student Rating-Weighted"              StudentRa
      Total                                Total
   (Average-                             (Average-
   Faculty+Stude                         Ficulty+Studen   r r           V   <-K
    nt Rating)                           I Rating)
      Rating for Part I                    Rating for Part I
 Note:  % weight allocation for the functions of faculty members shall be based on the existing policies
 on faculty workload
    II. Behavioral Indicators 110%)      II. Behavioral Indicators (10S)
      Yofal Score -~§ ehavlora?'           Total Score • behavioral
 Instructor  Asst  Prof  Asso.Prof  Prof  Univ  Prof.  Indicators  Indicators___________________  1 4
                                                      _________
                                            No  of PI
 1. Instruction   80%  70%  60%  35%  30%  No. of PI  Rating tor Pan II (T  Score/  J L jtfL .
 2  Research   10%  10%  20%  40%  45%  Rating for Part  II (T. Score/ PI)  3 =
 3. Extension   5%*  10%*  10%*  10%*  10%*  IPCR Rating (90% Part 1+10% Pan  IFCR Rating (90% Part 1+10%
 4  Production   5%*  10%*  5%*  5%*  ill  Part li)_____________________
 6  Others  5%*  5%*  10%*  10%*  10%*  Adjectival Rating  Adjectival Rating
 It  For faculty members with designation. % weight  allocation shall be pro-rated based on approved   Discussed   Dscussed
 workload  rating with:                  rding with:
              &48mi]R£J*AUeJl£                     Q£Bt
                   Employee
    Assessed by                          Assessed by:       .
    I certify that I discussed my assessment   I certify that I disci, ssed my assessment
    of the performance wtth the employe*  of the performance with thp employee
                                                                    N3--
            GENEVIEVE L  VAIPEZ. PhD                        5    Iff*, run
               Immediate Supervisor                 Immediate i
    Final rating by                      Fnal rating by:
                                                   CeKAPlN            phC
               Head of Delivery Unit                Head o f  Delv&y Unit

       IFSU-HRD-PMT-F032
       Rev 00(Feb. 04  2BI9)
   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763