Page 268 - Теория кавитации

electrons are considered electromagnetic EP, but photons consist of corpuscles, and free
electrons that generate EMtF are more often considered as waves. Accordingly, we did
not find that the electromagnetic field was considered around a moving photon, whereas
around an electrical conductor an electromagnetic field is formed due to moving free
electrons. This question arises from the fact that it is right to say - both phenomena of
light and electricity come from EM - electromagnetism. If this were true, then physics
would teach to receive electricity and the electromagnetic field from the light given to
them by the Sun-God almost for nothing. Would mankind search for sources of
electricity for about a century and a half and conduct hundreds of experiments?
It is clear that both ci1 f and ci1 e are both cavitation, but each of them has its own
unique attributes, and so far no physics can fully describe them, since cavitation is still
an unrecognized phenomenon of a bubble essence, although the cavitation’s force (CS)
claims to be the sixth force for inclusion in the composition of the fundamental forces
of nature (FFN) - forces of natural interaction: gravitational, electric, magnetic, weak
and strong nuclear forces. At the same time, cavitation’s energy (CE), along with the
energy of natural radiation (natural radiation background - NRB), is free energy in the
sense of countering the spontaneous growth of entropy (Second law of
thermodynamics).
It will not be superfluous to recall here that it is Academician V.I. Vernadsky
argued: In nature, there is a single phenomenon - natural radiation (BNR), whose energy
is free energy. We intend to supplement this academic statement: and cavitation in nature
generates free energy - CE [43].
Who would have thought that this should be recognized? Here is another point that
cannot be overlooked: “Why is the natural background of radiation in the environment
not related to fundamental phenomena?”. In fact, NRB is a natural phenomenon, this
phrase has been known for a long time, how can nature be imagined without natural

radiation? The NRB force is neither weak nor strong nuclear forces, and without the
existence of NRB, the biosphere could not become and develop. As it is known to
experts and specialists, the metabolism of flora and fauna at the cellular level can occur
only with the direct participation of NRB. Obviously, the NRB effect itself, its strength
and energy are invisible, that because of this it was not yet included in the composition
of the Fund – FFIN?
Thus, taking into account the sacredness of the number 7 (7 sound note units, 7
rainbow-colored units in nature) in natural phenomena, we propose to increase the
content of the FFIN to seven: “gravitational, electric, magnetic, weak, strong nuclear,
cavitation and radiation interactions”. Could there be a “Great Unity” without such a full
force? Clearly no!
Here you are, the new einsteins - the new formulation of the fundamental task:
prove the “Great Unity - the Great Union” - the greatest law of nature and derive its
equation!
No wonder we mentioned Einstein in the last paragraph. In 1887, H. Hertz
conducted an experiment on the photoelectric effect. In 1900, M. Planck attempted to
267