Page 134 - Proceeding of Atrans Young Researcher's Forum 2019_Neat
P. 134

“Transportation for A Better Life:
                                                                                                                       Smart Mobility for Now and Then”

                                                                                    23 August 2019, Bangkok, Thailand

             human  knowledge  and  reasoning  into  travel   economic  characteristics  of  interviewees  were
             decisions is the focus of this study.            collected regarding location, gender, age, education,
                 The main objective of this study is to investigate   occupation,  personal  income,  and  household
             the  possibility  of  two  AI  methods  namely  EDT   income.  They  also  asked  for  their  travel  behavior
             Bagged and SVM to predict the travel decisions of   characterized  by  mobility-related  factors  including
             transport  users.  For  the  development  of  models,   trip  mode,  travel  distance,  trip  purpose,  and  the
             travel  interview  survey  was  conducted  with  the   possible  impact  of  parking  charge  on  their  travel
             involvement of 311 transport users at different land-  decisions. All transport users were given five travel
             use types in Hanoi, Vietnam. A number of 933 data   alternatives,  including  (1) using  current  mode,  (2)
             samples were then collected from 311 transport users   shift  to  bus,  (3)  shift  to  walk,  (4)  select  another
             and  discretized  to  construct  the  two  AI  “black-  destination, and (5) shift to taxi.
             boxes”. Validation of models was conducted using     Travel  decisions  also  strongly  influenced  by
             various criteria namely confusion matrix, Root Mean   parking  characteristics,  for  instance,  walking  time
             Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE)   and walking distance from parking location to the
             and accuracy. To finely estimate the robustness of   destination  [39],  provision  of  free  parking  [41],
             the two proposed AI algorithms, 1000 Monte Carlo   parking  requirements  [42],  strategies  for  parking
             simulations were then performed.                 [43], parking charge [44], and parking fee scheme
                                                              [45].  Among  those  influences,  parking  charge  has
             2. Data and Methods                              been  used  as  an  effective  instrument  for  traffic
                                                              management  [46]–[48].  In  order  to  emphasize  the
                 This  section  describes  the  data  used  for  this
             study,  the  classifiers  used  for  modeling  travel   decision  in  selecting  travel  alternatives  under  the
             decisions, and the methodology for evaluating their   impact of parking charge, each transport users was
             performance.                                     asked  three  times  with  the  increased  level  of
                                                              proposed  parking  fee:  (1)  pay  at  the  current  rate
             2.1. Impact Factors of Travel Decisions and Travel   (100%), two times higher (200%), and three times
             Interview Survey                                 higher (300%). Many people in Hanoi do not pay for
                                                              their parking vehicles. For instance, shoppers have
                 Travel  decisions  are  the  accumulation  of   free  parking  whenever  they  buy  something  in  the
             individuals’ preferences influenced by many impact   shops, or the parking fees of commuters are paid by
             factors   which   relate   to   socio-economic   their companies.
             characteristics  of  travelers,  including  gender  [32]   After being carefully collected, a number of 933
             occupation  [33],  [34],  income  [33],  [35],  trip  cost   data samples was obtained from 311 transport users
             [34],  [36],  travel  distance  [37],  travel  mode  and   with three times asking for willingness-to-pay for the
             departure time [38], the quality of walkway [39], and   parking  charge.  The  preprocessing  data  procedure
             car ownership rate [37], [40].                   was then carried out to construct the input and output
                 To analyze the impact of such factors on travel   spaces for the two AI numerical tools.
             decisions, travel interview survey of transport users
             was conducted in June 2016 in three major zones in   2.2. Preparation of Datasets
             Hanoi, including Old Quarter Area, Developed Area,
             and  New  Development  Area.  Old  Quarter  Area  is   In  the  present  study,  we  consider  input
             characterized by ancient buildings. It is the location   parameters  including  location  (X1),  gender  (X2),
             of the busiest shopping streets and tourist attractions.   age (X3), education (X4), occupation (X5), personal
             Developed Area is located inside the Ring Road II   income  (X6),  household  income  (X7),  trip  mode
             and having the highest population density. There is   (X8), trip purpose (X9), trip length (X10), trip cost
             mixed  land  use  area,  with  the  combination  of   (X11),  on-vehicle  duration  (X12),  parking  and
             Government  authorities,  office  buildings  and   walking duration (X13), real parking charge (X14)
             shopping streets. New Development Area is placed   and  proposed  parking  charge  (X15),  respectively.
             inside the area of Ring Road II and Ring Road III   The output (Y), referred to the travel decisions of
             with  modern  condominiums,  office  buildings  and   transport users, was discretized in five alternatives as
             universities.                                    mentioned  above.  To  generate  the  datasets  for
                 A total of 311 people was randomly selected at   modeling, 933 data samples collected was divided
             the buildings of different land use types. The socio-



                                                           109
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139