Page 130 - Proceeding of Atrans Young Researcher's Forum 2019_Neat
P. 130

“Transportation for A Better Life:
                                                                                                                       Smart Mobility for Now and Then”

                                                                                    23 August 2019, Bangkok, Thailand

             5. Conclusion                                    [2]  A.  Carrigan,  R.  King,  J.  M.  Velasquez,  M.
                    This paper presents the results of a rigorous   Raifman,  and  N.  Duduta,  “Social,  Environmental
             application of  the  BRTS  for evaluating  the Hanoi   and Economic Impacts of BRT systems: Bus Rapid
             BRT, which helps to find answers to three questions   Transit  Case  Studies  from  Around  the  World,”
             indicated  in  the  Sub-section  2.2.  First,  the  Hanoi   EMBARQ, Dec. 2013.
             BRT  meets  the  international  standards  to  be   [3] J. Ernst, “Initiating Bus Rapid Transit in Jakarta,
             considered as a basic BRT corridor. Second, main   Indonesia,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board,
             limitations  of  the  Hanoi  BRT  are  low  (design)   vol. 1903, pp. 20–26, Jan. 2005.
             capacity, low frequency, limited speed and lack of   [4] J. B. Ingvardson and O. A. Nielsen, “Effects of
             reliability and convenience. Carrying out technical   new  bus  and  rail  rapid  transit  systems  –  an
             solutions  is  promising.  Besides,  increasing   international review,” Transp. Rev., vol. 38, no. 1,
             frequency, especially in the peak hours would be a   pp. 96–116, Jan. 2018.
             useful approach to give better service and improve   [5] M.  H.  Nguyen,  T. T. Ha, T.  L. Le, and T.  C.
             enforcement.                                     Nguyen,  “Challenges  to  Development  of  Bus
                     It  should  be  noted  that  categories  and   System Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of
             criteria have interactions with others; therefore, it is   Surveys  in  Hanoi,” in  Transportation  for  a  Better
             interesting  to  re-evaluate  the  Hanoi  BRT  by  the   Life:  Mobility  and  Road  Safety  Managements,
             BRTS  after  solutions  are  implemented.  And  the   Bangkok, Thailand, 2017, pp. 1–10.
             improvement  of  score  can  act  as  an  evidence  to   [6] M.  H.  Nguyen,  T.  T. Ha,  S.  S.  Tu,  and T.  C.
             persuade  citizens  to  believe  in  the  quality  and   Nguyen,  “Impediments  to  the  bus  rapid  transit
             capacity of BRT, thus use it more. More importantly,   implementation in developing countries – a typical
             it will be the base to propose the following remedies.   evidence from Hanoi,” Int. J. Urban Sci., vol. 0, no.
                    As for limitation, in that the BRT Hanoi is a   0, pp. 1–20, Feb. 2019.
             complex and multifaceted system, some operational   [7] S. C. Wirasinghe, L. Kattan, M. M. Rahman, J.
             and design parameters used in this study would be   Hubbell, R. Thilakaratne, and S. Anowar, “Bus rapid
             different from those published previously to some   transit – a review,” Int. J. Urban Sci., vol. 17, no. 1,
             extent.  In  fact,  shortage  of  data  and  partly   pp. 1–31, Mar. 2013.
             inconsistence  between  data  sources  about  BRT   [8] “Global BRT Data,” 2017. [Online]. Available:
             corridors  are  the  common  issue  in  the  BRT   https://brtdata.org/.
             revolution. With using reports of the BRT company   [9] T. Deng, M. Ma, and J. Wang, “Evaluation of
             and information from  [6], the authors believe that   Bus Rapid Transit Implementation in China: Current
             outcomes are sufficiently reliable.              Performance  and  Progress,”  J.  Urban  Plan.  Dev.,
                                                              vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 226–234, Sep. 2013.
             6. Acknowledgment                                [10] C. Hughes and X. Zhu, “Guangzhou, China Bus
                    The  authors  highly  appreciate  anonymous   Rapid  Transit:  Emission  impact  analysis,”  ITDP,
             reviewer’s  constructive  comments  that  help  to   May 2011.
             strengthen the final version. And they would like to   [11] Y. Y. C. Mallqui and D. Pojani, “Barriers to
             give a big thank to organizers of ATRANS annual   successful Bus Rapid Transit expansion: Developed
             conference  that  is  such  an  interesting  and  useful   cities  versus  developing  megacities,”  Case  Stud.
             environment of young researchers.                Transp. Policy, Feb. 2017.
                    This paper is comprised of main content of   [12]  E.  Babalik-Sutcliffe  and  E.  C.  Cengiz,  “Bus
             the work to gain an engineer’s degree of HNN under   Rapid Transit System in Istanbul: A Success Story
             the  supervision  of  SST  and  the  support  of  MHN.   or Flawed Planning Decision?,” Transp. Rev., vol.
             Some  content  was  revised  by  MHN  to  adapt  the   35, no. 6, pp. 792–813, Nov. 2015.
             current operation of the Hanoi BRT.              [13] A. Rizvi and E. Sclar, “Implementing bus rapid
                                                              transit:  A  tale  of  two  Indian  cities,”  Res.  Transp.
                              References                      Econ., vol. 48, pp. 194–204, Dec. 2014.
             [1] D. Stead and D. Pojani, “The Urban Transport   [14]  O.  Heddebaut,  B.  Finn,  S.  Rabuel,  and  F.
             Crisis  in  Emerging  Economies:  A  Comparative   Rambaud, “The European Bus with a High Level of
             Overview,”  in  The  Urban  Transport  Crisis  in   Service  (BHLS):  Concept  and  Practice,”  Built
             Emerging Economies, D. Pojani and D. Stead, Eds.   Environ., vol. Vol36, no. n3, pp. p307-316, 2010.
             Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp.   [15]  The  Institute  for  Transportation  and
             283–295.                                         Development  Policy  [ITDP],  “The  Bus  Rapid



                                                           105
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135