Page 371 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 371

Notwithstanding the failure of any party to the proceedings to serve a counter-notice objecting to
               the admissibility of a written statement, the Court may, if it thinks fit, permit the party to lead

                                                                                    99
               evidence contradicting the evidence contained in the written statement.
               Where contradicting evidence is given as mentioned in subsection (6), the party who tendered

               the written statement may lead additional evidence in response to the contradicting evidence.

               A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him or her in writing, or

               reduced into writing and relevant to matters in question in the suit or proceeding in which he or
               she is cross-examined, without the writing being shown to him or her or being proved; but if it is

               intended to contradict him or her by the writing, his or her attention must, before the writing can

               be proved, be called to those parts of it which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him
               or her. 100


               If a witness upon cross-examination as to a previous oral statement made by him or her relevant
               to matters in question in the suit or proceeding in which he or she is cross-examined,  and

               inconsistent with his or her present testimony, does not distinctly admit that he or she made the
               statement, proof may be given that he or she did in fact make it, but before such proof can be

               given, the circumstances of the  supposed statement, sufficient  to designate the particular
               occasion, must be mentioned to the witness, and he or she must be asked whether or not he or

               she made the statement. 101




               Guyana

               The admission of rebuttal evidence in Guyana is guided by the common law.

               A witness under cross-examination may be  asked whether he has made  any  former statement

               relative to the subject matter of the cause or matter inconsistent with his present testimony, the

               circumstance of the proposed statement being referred to sufficiently to designate the particular







               99  Grenada – Evidence Act Cap. 92, section 36C(6)
               100  Grenada – Evidence Act Cap. 92, section 145(1)
               101  Grenada – Evidence Act Cap. 92, section 145(2)
                                                                                                           33
   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376