Page 372 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 372

occasion, and, if he does not distinctly admit that he has made that statement, proof may be given
               that he did in fact make it. 102


               The same course may be taken with a witness upon his examination in chief, if the judge is of
               opinion that he is adverse to the party by whom he was called, or that his memory is in good

               faith at fault, and permits the question. 103

               A witness under cross-examination, or a witness whom the judge, under the provisions of the

               preceding section, has permitted to be examined by  the party who called him as to previous
               statements inconsistent with his present testimony, may be questioned as to previous statements

               made by him in writing, or reduced into writing, relative to the subject matter of the cause or

               matter, without the writing being shown to him or being proved in the first instance; but, if it
               intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before contradictor proof can be

               given, be called to those parts of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting
               him. 104


               The judge may, at any time during the hearing or trail, require the document to be produced for
               his inspection and may thereupon make any use of it for the purposes of the hearing or trial he

               thinks fit. 105

               Jamaica

               In cases where the right of reply depends on the question whether evidence has been called for

               the defence, the fact that the person charged has been called as a witness shall not of itself confer

               on the prosecution the right of reply. 106

               If  a witness, upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by him relative to the

               subject-matter of the cause, and inconsistent with his present testimony, does not distinctly admit
               that he has made such statement, proof may be given that he did in fact make it; but before such

               proof can be  given, the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the





               102  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 79(1)
               103  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 79(2)
               104  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 80(1)
               105  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 80(2)
               106  Jamaica – Evidence Act 1843, section 11
                                                                                                           34
   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377