Page 330 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 330

R v Gray [2004] EWCA Crim 1074








                    ■ On appeal, the court laid down 7 principles in attempting to

                          distil the law in relation to the giving of the good character

                          direction. Rix LJ stated that:


                                  “(4) Where a defendant of previous good character,

                    whether absolute or, we would suggest, effective, has been
                    shown at trial, whether by admission or otherwise, to be guilty

                    of criminal conduct, the prima facie rule of practice is to deal

                    with this by qualifying a Vye direction rather than by

                    withholding it (Vye, Durbin, Aziz); but


                                  (5) In such a case, there remains a narrowly

                    circumscribed residual discretion to withhold a good character

                    direction in whole, or presumably in part where it would make
                    no sense, or would be meaningless or absurd or an insult to

                    common sense, to do otherwise (Zoppola-Barrazza and dicta

                    in Durbin and Aziz).”
   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335