Page 399 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 399

instant case, taking into account in particular the appellant’s confession and the other items of
               circumstantial evidence referred to by the learned Resident Magistrate in her reasons for

               judgment (see para. [43] above), it appears to us that this is a case in which the potential benefit
               of a good  character direction to the appellant was wholly outweighed by the nature and

               coherence of the evidence which she accepted. We accordingly consider that ground four must

               fail as well.” 220



               Bad Character


               Generally speaking, no question should be asked of a person charged with an offence that would
               tend to illicit evidence that he is of bad character. 221


               Evidence of the bad character of an accused person may be  adduced  in the following
               circumstances:


                   (a)  the proof that he has committed or been convicted of such other offence is admissible
                       evidence to show that he is guilty of the offence wherewith he is then charged, or

                   (b) he has personally or by his advocate asked questions of the witnesses for the prosecution
                       with a view to establish his good character, or has given evidence of his good character,

                       or the nature or conduct of the defence is such as to involve imputations on the character
                       of the prosecutor or the witnesses for the prosecution; or

                   (c) he has given evidence against any other person charged with the same offence. 222



               Montserrat

               A person charged and called as a witness in pursuance of this Act shall not be asked, and if asked

               shall not be required to answer any question tending to show that he has committed, or been





               220  Patricia Henry v R [2011] JMCA Crim 16
               221  Jamaica – Evidence Act 1843, section 9(f)
               222  Jamaica – Evidence Act 1843, section 9(f)(i)(ii)(iii); Note also that under section 15 of the Act, a party calling a witness is not
               allowed to impeach his credit by calling evidence of his bad character. However, of in the opinion of the judge the witness proves
               adverse, he may,  with leave of the judge, be contradicted  by  other evidence that he  has made at other  times a statement
               inconsistent with his present testimony.
                                                                                                           60
   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404