Page 82 - demo
P. 82

PROBLEMS & ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED




               The utility and feedstock consumption for production of methanol depends on the process
               scheme,  feedstock  type  and  export  or  import  of  power.  Estimated  raw  material  &  utility
               consumptions  for  production  of  1  MT  of  methanol  from  different  hydrocarbon  feedstocks
               and processes is shown in Table 19. It should be noted that autothermal reformer consumes
               more  gas  but  exports  power  with  lower  consumption  of  steam  and  water  as  compared  to
               that of steam reformer. Therefore, this option is more economical for gaseous hydrocarbon
               feedstocks. However, these figures are only indicative because the calorific value of coal is
               varying widely and the purity of methanol is also not fully defined.

                 TABLE 19
               Feedstock & Utility Consumption per MT for Methanol

                          Per MT of  Methanol       Methanol from NG (Auto         Methanol from NG
                 Inputs
                          Methanol    from Coal        Thermal Reformer)          (Steam Gas reformer)
                Coal      MT/MT           1.72                  -                            -
                NG        SM3/MT           -                   842                         795
                Oxygen    MT/MT           1.07                 0.72                          -
                Steam     MT/MT          0.168                0.138                      0.9 to 0.98
                Power     KWH/MT           --                 (-) 0.25                    65 to 68
                Water     M3/MT         15 to 18              4 to 5                     6.5 to 6.7

               The cost of a large scale IGCC plant based on coal gasification, oxygen firing and carbon
               sequestering with provision for producing both methanol and power is of the order of 2000
               Euro (approx. 1,40,000 INR) per KW of power  [126]. The overall energy efficiency for coal
               conversion is about 50 to 55%. With time, the efficiency is increasing due to better design
               and the investment cost is also reducing. On an average about 1Ton of coal is required to
               produce little over 2 MW of power. When I Ton of coal is converted to methanol or DME via
               IGCC, about 500 Kg of methanol or 350 Kg of DME is produced. Most of the IGCC based
               methanol plants also produce some power for its internal consumption and some surplus for
               the grid. The investment cost depends mostly on the location, feed characteristics and the plant
               sophistication level. There is wide variation in product mix, technology selected, operating and
               emission control strategy, feedstock type etc.
               In Assam, one gas based plant for 500 TPD of methanol at a cost of Rs.1028 Crores is being
               considered. However, this plant is based on Natural Gas. West Bengal Government is also
               considering a plant for producing 1500 Ton of Methanol per day and fuel gas from Coal.


               5.1.2
               ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY FOR BIOMASS BASED PLANTS
               A feasibility report was prepared by Envitech recently for 6 MW Biogas power Plants (in 3
               Blocks) for 135,000 MT/year of manure and agricultural residue/forage crops. About 45 million
               KWh Green power exported to the grid plus solid and liquid fertilizer for fertilizing 72 Hectares.
               This plant would cost about 10 Million Euro (approximately Rs. 100 Crores) [111].
               It is expected that the share of biomass in the world will soon be of about 60% of the renewable
               power produced, which will be about 20% of total energy produced from all sources. It is thus
               worth looking into this option to produce renewable electricity. This electricity could be used to
               generate hydrogen for conversion to methanol with carbon dioxide. Both these technologies
               are available, and the cost is much lower with all the associated environmental benefits [112].
               The  production  of  biogas  by  anaerobic  digestion  (biomethanation)  is  the  cheapest  way  to
               convert a major portion of organic wastes. Therefore, before using the biomass for gasification,
               possibility of conversion to biogas through biomethanation must be explored. Use of this biogas





                  82      Methanol and DME Production: Survey and Roadmap | 2017
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87