Page 32 - Composing Processes and Artistic Agency
P. 32

The topography of composing work  21

            competences. In addition, characterising two people as peers presupposes that
            they acknowledge each other as such. Composers depend on connections with
            both peers and non-peers to be able to handle the organisational and artistic
            challenges of the composition process, as we will discuss in the following
            section.

            1.2.1 The audience
            That the audience is highly significant is undisputed, and is underlined by
            Becker (1982/2008: 214), among others: “Though audiences are among the
            most fleeting participants in art worlds, […] they probably contribute most to
            the reconstitution of the work on a daily basis. Audiences select what will
            occur as an art work by giving or withholding their participation in an event
            or their attention to an object”. On the immaterial level, the audience con-
            tributes decisively to artists’ public presence and reputation. At the same time,
            viewers and listeners are their partners in an economic exchange.
              Composers are aware of the audience’s importance and their consequent
            dependence on it. All the composers we interviewed worked on their relation-
            ships with the audience and with the musical public sphere. As one composer
            said bluntly, “If I don’t give a shit how my work’s received out there, then I
            don’t really need to have it performed, do I!” At the same time, however, they
            articulated their relationship with the audience in very different ways. On the
            one hand, they referred to the audience’s anticipated capacity to absorb –
            “you mustn’t ask too much of the audience”– or just expressed the hope of
            getting an emotional reaction: the piece “must have an impact”. Some, on the
            other hand, do not ascribe very much relevance to the audience despite its
            important place in the concert sector: “To be honest, I’m not really interested in
            what the audience expects to hear.” Or: “Idon’t want to become subservient.”
            Yet attitudes to the audience do not conform to an either-or principle, whereby
            the audience is either served affirmatively or dismissed as irrelevant. Rather, it
            is proof of the composers’ professionalism that they neither let their existing
            dependence on the audience turn into frustration or rejection nor let it
            become the defining aspect of the composition process.
              As part of the creative process, composers regularly consider the performance
            context and the impact of their music. Since emotions play an important role in
            numerous ways, the work of composing always includes self-reflexive
            moments: for instance, what effect does a tone in a certain context have on
            me or the listeners? Bernhard Gander, who sees himself “as the audience’s
            representative”, systematically puts himself in its stead during the review and
            correction phase that comes towards the end of the composition process: “I
            always imagine myself sitting in the audience when the piece is being played.
            Is it interesting enough?” Similarly, Judit Varga does not conceive of the
            audience as a homogenous crowd. Rather, “I always keep two listeners in
            mind. One is a professional; the other has no clue about music. It’s important
            to me that both get something out of it.” Such reflexive-imaginative processes
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37