Page 47 - Composing Processes and Artistic Agency
P. 47

36  The topography of composing work

            Karlheinz Essl employs a small MIDI controller (KORG nanoControl),
            whose controls and buttons are laid out in such a way that he can operate
            several controls at the same time with one hand. That requires experience
            playing with the controls, which have to be appropriated to such an extent
            that the desired actions can be carried out seamlessly. Hands need to learn the
            anatomy of the material object and internalise it sufficiently to be able to
            work the controls only by touch. The importance of such buttons and con-
            trols for physical touch becomes evident in their absence. Essl contrasts the
            ease of use of MIDI controllers with touchscreens as follows: “They may be
            called touchscreens, but they only work if you’re looking at them. That’s very,
            very problematic. I mean, you can touch them, but you can’t touch them
            blind. You always need the visual feedback. And that makes the whole thing
            extremely unintuitive. Because you can’t feel them. Now the controls, they’re
            tactile, I can hold them in my hand, and I know them.” As he suggests, an
            intuitive work mode results from the way the respective apparatus is used:
            “Of course, there are some things you can do with a mouse too. But with a
            mouse you can only control one parameter at a time. With a controller you
            can do up to eight parameters at the same time, depending on how good you
            are. But that’s quite a manual challenge, it needs regular practice.”
              The ongoing digitization of sound generation and music production is
            changing the interaction between people and machines. Composers can work
            intuitively once they have rehearsed certain processes and manipulations to
            the point of internalising them. They can then withdraw their attention from
            the operational level (e.g. controls for volume, sound mixing, switching algo-
            rithms) and instead concentrate on musical aspects (e.g. sound quality,
            rhythm, transitions). To reach this level of internalisation, Essl uses several
            sensory and sensorimotor abilities – sight, hearing, tactile senses and movement
            memorisation – and practised for a long time. This is an exemplary illustration
            of implicit knowledge. Michael Polanyi (1958: 49–59; 1966: 15–19) stresses
            that the relation between person and machine is strongly structured by an
            implicit directionality of thought. The movement of focal awareness goes from
            the controls (the proximal term: “proximus”–“close to the middle of the
            body”) towards the realisation-as-sound (the distal term: “distare”– “distant
            from the body”). To be able to accomplish this directionality of thought,
            composers must incorporate the proximal-term sequences to such an extent
            that they become self-evident and no longer need any mental representation
            in the sense of a consciously controlled process. That is the necessary pre-
            condition for being able to concentrate on the distal term and carry out the
            sequence of events.
              The regular use of instruments and technical apparatus creates an affective
            familiarity with them – an almost humanised relationship, even. We have
            already quoted Katharina Klement in the section on workplaces saying that
            her PA boxes “might be a bit oversized”, but that she “really like[s] them”
            because she has used “them for years”. Similarly, Karlheinz Essl considered
            taking his “Bose L1 column loudspeakers” to the performance of “Herbecks
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52