Page 76 - Composing Processes and Artistic Agency
P. 76

The processuality of composing  65

            by the sound quality of the recording, as he himself informed us. In his diary,
            he also articulates an appraisal (i.e. valuing) of the first results yielded by his
            exploring. Here, we assume that this valuing occurred in actu during
            the exploring and was entered into the diary later. Even in the first phase of
            exploring – long before the material has been comprehensively examined and
            the shape of the work has crystallised – there already exist criteria for valuing
            which influence the composer’s making, even though they remain unspoken.
            Exploring and valuing thus interact by generating and excluding possibilities.
              Understanding is likewise inherent in Karlheinz Essl’s exploring, since an
            implicit notion of which additional steps may be meaningful co-exists with
            exploring and valuing. Understanding largely occurs on a sensory and auditory
            level. Furthermore, reflective activities of understanding are linked to an
            aesthetic competence in valuing, which Karlheinz Essl has incorporated into
            his hearing after years of auditory training and experience as a composer and
            performing musician. Borrowing from Theodor W. Adorno (1963: 184), we
            might say that one aspect of composition work consists of “thinking with your
            ears”. The ear is an intelligent organ, which accompanies the compositional
            making, but also the compositional exploring, understanding and valuing.
              The following diary entry illustrates the dual perspective of composer and
            performer inherent in Essl’s exploring with performance in mind:

                [16 Jan 2014] I continued work on the MaxMSP Patch Herbeck Stutter,
                started yesterday, which is increasingly becoming a software instrument
                for playing the middle movement live. I fine-tune the algorithms by closely
                defining the system parameters and their mutual dependency. […] Having
                added two sound processors (flanger, frequency shifter), I can now give
                the primarily noise-like, spoken material harmonic colour, which
                further increases the possibilities for creative expression during a live
                performance. Finally I integrated a reverb with a freeze function. It can
                be used to create an infinite reverb from time to time which “freezes” the
                generated stream of sound.

            Here, Karlheinz Essl is not focused on examining and developing the musical
            material, but on developing and implementing the software instrument. In this
            context, his exploring, understanding, valuing and making unfold along the
            central question: what is the optimal software instrument for this performance?
            The question keeps him occupied for several days.

                [22 Jan 2014] The whole thing works magnificently, but I’m still looking
                for a universal solution for the piece. Instead of developing software for
                each movement, I’d rather develop all three movements using the same
                approach, a general meta-structure. […] I also subject the MIDI controller
                to critical scrutiny. I now check whether my kalimba equipped with a
                contact microphone can serve as a touch controller and soon realise that
                it would use up too much energy and time to program the device. I drop
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81