Page 256 - Crisis in Higher Education
P. 256

Reforming Administration and Management  •  227





             11.2  CREATING AN EXTERNAL RULING CLASS
             It is a challenge to know when and how the separation between admin-
             istration and faculty began, but it most likely started after World War II
             when the GI Bill and other factors stoked demand and an era of unprec-
             edented enrollment growth began. During this period, the oversight
             boards for public universities were perfunctory—filled with alumni of
             the university, supporters of the governor, and other political and com-
             munity leaders. These boards rarely said no. In responding to unprec-
             edented growth, errors were made, especially in allocating resources
             as universities built facilities to serve what appeared to be unending
             demand and hired administrators to solve problems. Little attention was
             paid to rising costs.
              As enrollment grew and problems that accompany growth contin-
             ued, states began to take board appointments more seriously. Wealthy
             alumni,  who were appointed to the board and made their money in
             business, engineering, medicine, or other endeavors, began to exercise
             authority. They  wanted more responsiveness and accountability from
             top  administrators. Thus, a process began to centralize decision mak-
             ing and move away from faculty administrators to professional managers
             who were hired through a national search process. Professional managers
             owed allegiance to the board and depended on its chairperson for recom-
             mendations for their next job. The idea of national searches and hiring
             external candidates expanded beyond the presidency to include VPs, pro-
             vosts, deans, and others. Many, even most, of the people hired to fill these
             positions, including the president, held faculty rank, but make no mis-
             take, these hires represent the “ruling class” with allegiance to the board,
             not the faculty. These professional tended to view management as an end
             in itself. They did not want to return to the faculty.
              In addition to this change in leadership, public universities became
             large, complex entities that are difficult to manage. Universities are not
             command and control organizations with top-down decision making and
             a singular bottom-line metric. They are PSOs that depend on the expertise
             and creativity of faculty to mediate relationships between students and
             potential employers. Faculty members co-create value by working closely
             with students, potential employers, and suppliers of learning materials to
             develop and deliver educational programs. They also work closely with
             government agencies, private companies, and other entities to develop and
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261