Page 108 - Was Hitler a Riddle?
P. 108

The French Diplomats  95

              X did not advocate a preventive war against Germany, but he did urge
            France and other powers to exercise “the utmost energy, [and] firmness”
            in dealing with Hitler and to reject any kind of compromise or agreement
            based “on empty promises.” France should maintain strong ties with friendly
            powers in the league of Nations and under no circumstances engage in
            negotiations with Nazi Germany, which in effect he dubbed a rogue state.
            agreements with Hitler would be nothing but “scraps of paper.”
              On december 19, 1933, one day after he had mailed this letter, X sent
            another one that expressed even more alarm over the international attitude
            toward Nazi Germany. He had just learned from French newspapers that
            three  prominent  Frenchmen  (Édouard  daladier,  Bertrand  de  Jouvenel,
            and Foreign Minister Joseph Paul-Boncour) had spoken out in favor of
            negotiations with Germany to reach a general agreement on outstanding
            issues, an approach with which François-Poncet agreed.  X was appalled:
                                                            1
            “such a proposal contains such a danger for France that one must ask one-
            self whether these gentlemen on the Pariserplatz [location of the French
            embassy in Berlin] have become prisoners of the reichskanzlei [office of
            the German chancellor]. in France, we Germans have been accused of hav-
            ing forgotten everything and of not having learned anything. that is in
            part psychologically true of our people, but why do the responsible French
            statesmen and diplomats commit the same mistake?” X repeated his previ-
            ous warning: dealing with Nazis will produce only disappointments. the
            only correct policy for France was “unyielding firmness.” X predicted that
            once “Hitler holds on to the little finger of Mr. Paul-Boncour, then he (see
            Mein Kampf) will want the whole arm. Hitler’s Germany knows no bounds
            and has no inclination to adapt to a peaceful europe. France has the right
            and duty to act in its own interest, the interest of europe and in the interest
            of humanity to make it absolutely clear to this Germany, which represents
            only a minority . . . [that] despite the pretense of an election on 12 Novem-
            ber [1933], its policy should be: tHis Far aNd NO FUrtHer!” 2
              X gave this advice to French statesmen when the Nazis had been in power
            less than a year, but ample evidence already supported his judgments about
            the new regime. With amazing speed, the Nazis had transformed Germany
            from a democracy to a ruthless dictatorship. in foreign affairs, Hitler’s gov-
            ernment had demonstrated that it would pursue a radically new path by
            withdrawing from the league of Nations and embarking on a program of
            rapid rearmament. the French government could have spared itself much
            pain and suffering had it followed X’s advice.
              the government’s reaction to X’s letter is not known, but the authori-
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113