Page 39 - Was Hitler a Riddle?
P. 39

26  The British Diplomats

                the ambassador followed all these events with great care, but he also
              went to the trouble of attentively reading Mein Kampf, a book whose prin-
              ciples, he concluded, accurately reflected Hitler’s policies and ultimate goals.
              On april 21, he indicated, in a confidential letter to secretary simon, that he
              was now pessimistic about Germany’s future. He had been secretly shown a
              letter by dr. Fritz Klein, the editor of the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, one
              of the few newspapers that still maintained “a semblance of independence.”
              Klein maintained close contact with Papen and was generally regarded as an
              astute observer of the political scene. He thought that Nazism might evolve
              into a “more moderate,” though “certainly . . . rather radical,” movement
              that might be “supportable.” But he considered it “more probable” that the
              movement “will become more and more extreme until it becomes unbear-
              able,” which could happen “in a few months.” 26
                rumbold was now prepared to draft his most famous dispatch, perhaps
              the most famous and most widely read in the history of the British Foreign
              Office. sent to london on april 26, 1933, only three months after Hitler
              became chancellor, the dispatch ran to five and a half long pages (about four
              thousand words) and reads like an analytical assessment of the Nazi regime
              that one might expect from a mature, insightful historian after the collapse
              of the Nazi state, when the relevant sources were available. the report was
              recognized at the time as a masterpiece and within the Foreign Office came
              to be known as the “Mein Kampf dispatch.” James ramsay Macdonald,
              the prime minister, read it and circulated it to the cabinet, which included
              Neville Chamberlain, who was then chancellor of the exchequer.
                rumbold began by pointing out that in their first three months in office
              the Nazis had not come up with a “constructive” economic policy but had
              instead concentrated on achieving “unchallenged supremacy” and on estab-
              lishing “a regime of brute force” with ultimate authority in Hitler’s hands.
              “the Nazi leader has only to express a wish to have it fulfilled by his fol-
              lowers.” rumbold conceded that the president and the reichswehr (armed
              Forces) might still have some restraining influence on the government, but
              he predicted, accurately it turned out, that once the president died—which
              happened in august 1934— the reichswehr would abandon its reservations
              and throw in its lot with the Führer. it therefore seemed advisable to rum-
              bold to devote an entire dispatch to Hitler “and the uses to which he may
              put his unlimited opportunities during the next four years.”
                the foci of the dispatch are Hitler’s fanaticism, his commitment to mili-
              tarism, his intention to expand into russia and the Baltic states “by force
              of arms,” and his cleverness in lulling Germany’s adversaries “into such a
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44