Page 67 - Bloomberg_Businessweek
P. 67

Bloomberg Businessweek                                                                    January 29, 2018


      financial and other resources more efficiently. And it also  A traditional view would insist none of this should
      needs to tackle the flaws created by its previous boom,  be working. The state is supposed to screw up econo-
      most of all the mountain of debt that continues to get  mies: Japan, India, the entire Soviet bloc—the list seems
      heavier and potentially more destabilizing.        endless. In China, the state seems to be preventing screw-
        Traditional economics would mandate that China over-  ups. When companies have expanded too quickly and
      haul its current economic system. Only a greater role for  possibly taken on too much risk, such as property devel-
      market forces will sort out the country’s problems and set  oper Wanda Group or the mysterious Anbang Insurance
      the economy onto the correct path for development. That  Group, the government has played watchdog and appar-
      entails withdrawing the state’s heavy hand in the economy:  ently pressed them to scale back. State ownership of the
      stopping meddlesome bureaucrats from messing around  financial sector maintains a degree of confidence in the
      with the allocation of capital and credit, opening protected  economy that might be lost under similar, debt-heavy
      sectors to competition, allowing money to flow more freely  circumstances in a freer market. When investors did get
      in and out of the country, releasing the currency from state  spooked by a stock market implosion in 2015 and cash
      manipulation, and reforming or even closing blundering  gushed out of the country, regulators tightened capital
      state-owned enterprises.                           controls and squelched the turmoil.
        Officially, that’s where Beijing is headed. Its leaders  In addition to preventing bad outcomes, the government
      repeatedly stress how China will continue “opening up”  also seems to be engineering good ones. Continued public
      and become more “market-oriented.” In practice, how-  investment in infrastructure is opening up remote regions
      ever, Beijing is charting an entirely different course. Rather  of the country to greater business opportunities, expanding
      than stepping aside, the Communist Party is entrenching  incomes in rural areas and small towns, and adding fresh
      itself even more deeply in the management of state com-  sources of consumer spending. The subsidies dished out by
      panies. Regulators have determined that they, not cor-  local governments are helping entrepreneurs start compa-
      porate executives, know best how Chinese companies  nies and create jobs.
      should invest overseas. Capital controls remain as tight as  Of course, we can’t know for certain where these
      ever; the currency is still under the thumb of the central  policies will take China. Nor can we tell what’s really hap-
      bank. The opening of China’s market to foreign business  pening in the economy. Bank balance sheets may not
      is going nowhere fast. Nor does the state allow the market  expose the full extent of the financial damage being done   65
      to choose winners and losers. It dominates the financial  by state practices. Nor can we trust government data,
      industry and doles out large subsidies to favored indus-  which almost certainly fails to represent the country’s
      tries and companies. Even its censoring of the internet  real economic conditions. And it remains far from cer-
      has intensified, constraining the free exchange of infor-  tain that China’s leadership can successfully transform
      mation supposedly indispensable to innovation. In one  the country from a factory floor that makes lots of cheap
      2017 study, China was the worst of 65 countries in abuse  stuff to a center of innovation that generates real techno-
      of internet freedom.                               logical advances and breakthrough products. Failing to
        And the result? Nothing like the disaster many of us  do that will likely make it much harder to keep improv-
      would expect. Growth, though sharply reduced from the  ing the welfare of China’s aging 1.4 billion people, who
      levels of a few years ago, is still powering ahead at almost  are still much poorer than those in the most advanced
      7 percent a year, according to official statistics. Incomes  economies. But if things continue as they are, we have to
      continue to rise nicely. Exports are strong. China has sped  take seriously the possibility that China has found a way to
      ahead of the rest of the world in developing an electric car  coordinate state action with just enough market influence
      market. And that strangled internet? Not an issue. China’s  to target and achieve positive results that a more open
      digital economy is exploding, with online shopping,  economy may not be able to match. Perhaps China really
      mobile payments, and internet-based financial services  is refashioning capitalism.
      advancing at light speed. Whole neighborhoods of start-  Perhaps. I, for one, am still clinging to my maxims. My
      ups are popping up in Shenzhen, Beijing, and elsewhere.  favorite: You can’t escape math. Eventually, the weight
        About that debt. Yes, it’s still rising, to 256 percent  of numerical reality has to come to bear. Maybe China
      of gross domestic product in mid-2017. History tells us  can escape a financial crisis others could not, but as debt
      that countries that experience a rapid surge of debt like  mounts, it drags down potential growth. And there is an
      China has over the past decade inevitably stumble into  unavoidable cost, too. Someone will have to pick up the
      some sort of banking crisis. If my maxims are still valid,  tab for the bad loans at Chinese banks, many of them still
      history should be repeating itself in China. But it’s not.  likely unrecognized because of a lack of transparency.
      The accepted outlook is that China will avoid the full-on  Another downside of continued state meddling is the
      meltdown we’ve come to expect from debt-gorged     stunting of productivity gains, without which sustaining
      emerging markets and instead will peacefully manage its  healthy growth will prove almost impossible. Maybe my
      way through the problem with a state-guided process to  rules of economics will hold firm after all. But thanks to
      bring down leverage.                               China, I’m prepared to edit them.
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72