Page 100 - Eclipse of God
P. 100

Religion and Modern Thinking  73

               There are supposed to exist, however, a few ancient manda-
            las and many modern ones in whose centre “no trace of divin-
                             52
            ity is to be found.”  The symbol which takes its place in the
            modern images is understood by the creators of these man-
            dalas, according to Jung, as “a centre within themselves.” “The
            place of the deity,” Jung explains, “appears to be taken by the
            wholeness of man.” This central wholeness, which symbolizes
            the divine, Jung, in agreement with ancient Indian teaching,
            calls the self. This does not mean, says Jung, that the self takes
            the place of the Godhead in these images in which the un-
            conscious of modern man expresses itself. One would grasp
            Jung’s idea better if one said that from now on the Godhead no
            longer takes the place of the human self as it did in mankind
            up till now. Man now draws back the projection of his self on a
            God outside of him without thereby wishing to deify himself (as
            Jung here emphasizes, in contrast to another passage, in which,
            as we shall see, deification is clearly stated as a goal). Man does
            not deny a transcendent God; he simply dispenses with Him.
            He no longer knows the Unrecognizable; he no longer needs to
            pretend to know Him. In His place he knows the soul or rather
            the self. It is indeed not a god that “modern consciousness”
            abhors, but faith. Whatever may be the case concerning God,
            the important thing for the man of modern consciousness is to
            stand in no further relation of faith to Him.
               This man of “modern consciousness” is not, to be sure, to
            be identified with the human race that is living to- day. “Man-
                           53
            kind,” says Jung,  “is still in the main in a psychological state
            of infancy— a level which cannot be leaped over.” This is il-
            lustrated by the Paulinian overcoming of the law which falls
            only to those persons who know to set the soul in the place of
            conscience. This is something very few are capable of doing.
               What does this mean? By conscience one understands of
            old, whether one ascribes to it a divine or a social origin or
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105