Page 56 - Corporate_Professional_Today
P. 56

Weekly Review






                                           A Weekly Guide to

                        Statutory Changes & Landmark Rulings








                            Goods and Services Tax






                          Case laws                        Municipal  Corporation  was  liable  to  service
                                                           tax under category of ‘commercial or industrial
                 Constructi on of parking lot for          construction service’.
                 Municipal Corporati on is liable                Money transfer service provided in
                 to service tax as ‘Commercial                   India to customers of a foreign Co.
                 constructi on service’
                                                                 was Export of service: HC

           ANS Constructions Ltd. v.  CST  [2018] 89
           taxmann.com 50 (New Delhi - CESTAT)             CST v.  Reliance Money Express Ltd. [2017]
                                                           88 taxmann.com 284 (Bom.)
           The assessee was engaged in the construction
           activities. It had undertaken the construction of   The assessee had entered into an agreement
           parking lots at Narender Cinema and Nehru       with foreign company. It provided money
           Garden for Municipal Corporation. It contended   transfer services to its customers and recipients
           that such activity was not liable to service tax   in India. It received fees and charges as per
           on the ground that these properties were of     the agreement. It paid certain amount as
           non-commercial nature. The department held      service tax under protest and filed a refund
           that such activity was liable to service tax    claim by contending that service rendered by
           under category of ‘commercial or industrial     it would fall under the category of ‘export
           construction service’. The assessee filed an    of service’.
           appeal in the Tribunal.                         The department rejected the refund claim of
                                                           the assessee. The assessee  filed an appeal to
           The Tribunal held that the parking lots were
           used for commercial purpose and it could not    the Commissioner (Appeals) and Commissioner
           be considered as a non-commercial activity.     (Appeals) allowed the appeal in favour of
           Therefore, construction of parking lots for     assessee. The Tribunal rejected the appeal


                                                                                                  163
                           January 20 To January 26, 2018 u Taxmann’s Corporate Professionals Today u Vol. 41 u 57
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61