Page 129 - Student: dazed And Confused
P. 129

seems so much  harder than  punctuating prose.  And so I  use the bare minimum I can get
               away with so it makes sense.  'In  pain and  peace' as an example, would  not work at all  if it
               was punctuated -  guitars don't have colons and commas, they just run on  until the amp
               explodes.



                I was quite surprised that my peer group did  not pick up on  my grammatical quirks as it
               seemed  like a fault in comparison.  They were more concerned with the words and content
               of the  poems.  That was a  blessing for me as I, you  now know, do not care much for the
               technicalities...  not when time  is so scarce.  They all offered  helpful  ideas such as how the
               dog poem should  maybe lose and  or a  but.  On rereading it,  I discovered a few more
               extraneous little words that got the chop too.  I offered the  poem with a second  I  had
               written shortly after but 'Torn to shreds' won out, despite  needing slightly more work, as it
                had such strong visual qualities.  The line that originally read 'And then hungry dogs, mad
               dogs,  rabid dogs' was changed to reading 'And then  howling dogs,  hungry dogs,  mad dogs'
               and  i think it sounds better.  I was advised to maybe leave the  line at two types of dogs but I
               couldn't quite bring myself to do that as I  like the set of three, so I substituted a word and
               shifted around a  little.  Now,  I  like the  H sound  in that bit.


               There was very little work I  needed to do, and  was willing to do, on 'In  pain and  peace.'  The
                poem had already been edited quite a  bit and was received very well at a  previous reading.
                My only concern with this was the phrase 'bleed  redder and  redder' which has now replaced
               'bleed deeper and deeper'.  I  realised shortly before the  performance that it sounded weird
               to have two ee sounds so close together.  I also intend to read this at the end of term
                performance -  a challenge as it is a  high energy piece.


               'Beautiful things' was my attempt at writing something a  bit more cheerful than my usual
               work,  but considering it is about a soul  being guided through  life and death,  it probably isn't
               that different.  I decided to write this one in a  number of two lined verses  because it just
               seemed to fall out of my pen like that -  a series of moments where a  person may just
               vaguely notice or sense the titular beautiful things.  I chose this as an example of my
               experimenting with form a  bit more.  It was intended to be a  metric poem with the same
                number of beats in a  line,  but some of the words were a syllable too long or short.  So with
                me  unable to think of any suitable alternative, I shortened one or two words (beside for
               'side) and  I cut one entire verse out:
                       Ghostly essences of my guardians

                       Are watching my each and  every step
                I  like the verse and  wish I  had  left it in,  but 'each and every' jarred with  me and  sounded a
                bit rubbish when  I  read  it out.


                Now, ' Passive',  I  must confess that I was thoroughly unhappy with  including it because it
               was one of my most over-written  pieces to date.  But,  my peers seemed to like  it.  I
                punctuated  it and  used  lower cases to begin some lines.  I  realised  myself that I should at
                least have a go at it, though  most people barely mentioned  it.  I was told that there were
               some  lines that didn't quite flow due to the words I  used, so I found substitutes like forever
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134