Page 130 - Student: dazed And Confused
P. 130

where it previously said  permanently.  It sounds much better for having made even these
                minor changes, though I drew the line when one person suggested finding something else
               for silently as I  used  it twice in the final verse.  The repetition of certain words and  ideas
                have become part of my style.



                I was going to put a short poem of similar length called  'stolen  night'  in  place of 'Blossom'.  I
               am  not sure why I chose this one as the other was technically better, littered with
               alliteration, onomatopoeia and very vivid  imagery.  I did get rather experimental with
               changing meanings so perhaps 'Blossom' won for its simplicity.  I  rejected the idea of
               swapping the bull  line with the god  line because I wanted the earthly object to come first.
               One member of the group recommended that I  play with  how it looked on the page, and  I
               ended  up putting it in the  middle of a  pure white sheet.  This then  became a  poem meant to
                be seen as a  petal on the  page.



               'I will do these things' was written as another exploration of voice and form.  Originally, this
               was another 'straight down the page' poem.  After a  lecture on form,  i went back and
               separated the 2nd, 3rd and 4th stanzas into indented and  non-indented  lines to represent a
                more conversational tone of voice/verse.  I was asked to have a think about the line that
                now reads

               'When you start to crumble
                                     I'll  help you stand tall'
               They gave me a  possible alternative of

               'I'll hold you  up
                              When you start to fall'
               Which is a very nice line itself and  probably would  have fitted well, only I thought it was a
                little too obvious and  I wanted to avoid that.





                Poetry,  like all writing,  has widely accepted  rules, though these are  by no means hard and
               fast.  Whatever the case,  I can say that none of these pieces conform to these  rules.  A
               writer creates one's own  rules as they find their own style.  I write many poems that were
               always leaning towards performance even though I  have found  I tend to make an idiot of
                myself when  I  perform -  probably because I am not as confident in  my work as perhaps I
               should  be.  But, that's my style of doing things and,  like an artisan  honing his craft,  I  have
               discovered  my own way of doing things.

                Performing a  poem is not the same as reading one.  I  performed  'Torn to shreds' and  'In
                pain and  peace'.  I wasn't too happy with the way either of them came out on the night as I
                had  not banked on so many nerves in the air; they sounded so different performing for a
                room of people instead of my trolls at home.  The guitar piece worked well and  people
               seemed to like it.  I was happier with that than the other because I  had spent much more
               time getting to know it.  'Torn to shreds'  however...  I wasn't unhappy with  it and  it was a
                blessedly long way from  being a disaster -  I just think I would  have chosen another one to
                perform if I  had  known.  I've seen people like  Benjamin Zephaniah and  Dreadlockalien
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135