Page 100 - Judge Manual 2017
P. 100

the protest committee make their decision?

                       Such witnesses, who stay for the decision, must not give any new evidence
                       after the parties have been dismissed. The members giving evidence are not
                       interested parties. They are a part of an independent body, with nothing to gain
                       or  lose  from  the  decision.  Remaining  as  a  part  of  the  protest  committee
                       corporate body helps to portray the protest committee as an independent body
                       with an interest in the fairness of the competition as a whole. Usually, witnesses
                       who are part of the protest committee would stay in the room as part of the
                       protest committee making the decision.

                       In cases where the chairman or the protest committee member or members
                       who is the witnesses feels uncomfortable, the witness would leave the room
                       when the protest committee begins its deliberations. Be aware that dismissing
                       protest committee witnesses while the remaining members make the decision
                       tends to portray protest committee members as individuals who are intent on
                       protesting individual boats, and having a personal interest in the success of
                       their protests. The practice of dismissing protest committee witnesses becomes
                       embarrassing when all members of the protest committee witness an incident.
                       However, should the protest committee be convinced that the protestee feels
                       genuinely  and  strongly  that  it  would  be  unjust  for  the  one  or  two  protest
                       committee witnesses to remain, then the protest committee witness should be
                       dismissed  for  the  decision.  Rule  N3.2  provides  that  the  protest  committee
                       remains  properly  constituted  as  long  as  3  members  remain  and  at  least  2
                       members are International Judges.
               K.28  Doping

                       Drug  testing  can  be  initiated  only  with  written  permission  from  the  national
                       authority or the World Sailing.
                       Competitors cannot protest alleged infringements of rule 5; hearings in relation
                       to drug abuse can be initiated only after a competitor has refused to be tested
                       or failed a drug test.
                       Since  the  testing  of  samples  takes  several  weeks,  the  process  of  imposing
                       penalties, when World Sailing Regulation 21 applies, will fall outside the protest
                       committee’s jurisdiction.  Rule 63.1 does not apply.
               K.29  Redress

                       A boat whose score or place in a race or series that has been made significantly
                       worse through no fault of her own may, in circumstances complying with rule
                       62.1, be granted redress.

                       Redress cannot be granted without a hearing (rule 63.1).

               K.29.1 Who May Request Redress?
                       a. A boat (rule 60.1(b))

                           The introduction to the Racing Rules of Sailing, under Terminology, states
                           that a “Boat” means a sailboat and the crew on board.

                           Normally  boats  request  redress  for  themselves;  however,  this  is  not  a
                           requirement of the rules. A boat or its crew may request redress for another
                           boat.  Rule  60.2(b)  requires  the  protest  committee  to  include  all  boats
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105