Page 69 - Judge Manual 2017
P. 69

The Judges should be available to competitors on shore after racing to discuss
                       any  of  their  calls.  These  discussions  should  always  be  between  the
                       competitor and the Judges who penalized the incident. The Chairman may want
                       to monitor the conversations discretely and moderate if the conversation starts
                       to become contentious or heated.

               I.11  Rule 42 Redress Hearing


                       Rules  do  not  prevent  a  boat  from  requesting  redress  alleging  that  the
                       disqualification was an improper action of the Jury.

                       If using Appendix P, redress is limited to action taken by a judge under P1 due
                       to a failure to take into account race committee signals or to interpret class rules
                       correctly, unless this is modified by the sailing instruction. As an example, the
                       Laser Class use a modified wording to P4.
               I.12  Appendix P—Special Procedures for Rule 42


                       Appendix P outlines the procedures for penalizing and penalties for breaking
                       rule 42 on the water. This system evolved from several systems previously used
                       by  many  classes  and  multi-class  regattas.  It  made  its  debut  in  Olympic
                       Competition in 1992.

                       As with all systems, there are advantages and disadvantages.

                       Advantages
                          •  Competitors see Judges taking action and understand the limits of rule 42.
                          •  The  second,  third  and  subsequent  penalties  are  severe  enough  to
                             discourage competitors from breaking the rule.
                          •  Competitors are much more aware of the circumstances at the time of
                             the penalty, enabling a more useful discussion after the race.

                       Disadvantages

                          •  When  the  competitors  are  in  a  tight  bunch,  a  delay  can  occur  before
                             Judges can signal the penalty (e.g. sculling at the start). This causes
                             confusion and reactions from competitors (e.g., ‘I wasn't doing anything’).
                          •  The number of on-the-water Judges is frequently insufficient to monitor
                             the whole fleet consistently. Consequently, the competitors believe the
                             judging to be inconsistent because the Judges will miss some severe
                             infractions,  while  seeing  and  then  penalizing  other  less  severe
                             infractions.
                          •  The Jury boats may be inadequate to motor through the fleet, preventing
                             the Judges from monitoring the whole fleet evenly.
                          •  Competitors may tend to not take their personal responsibility for obeying
                             rule 42.
                          •  When they think the Judges are not watching, they may increase their
                             kinetics until they get caught, believing that the gains they make will be
                             worth the risk of the occasional Two Turns Penalty.






                                                                                                         -   18
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74