Page 23 - Mainstreamer Volume 1 Issue 2 Feb 2023
P. 23

ARTICLE REVIEW


          model that is an extension of the social model.     a religious model of disability differs from that of a
          This model suggests a realistic action. Proponents   moral model, simply because the source of the law
          seek to put pressure on international networks      is not at the lowest echelon, moral law is arguably
          to respond to disability in the context of human    the idea that is derived from Natural Law. Since
          rights, rather than just as a social construct.     moral law is being lower in the hierarchy than
                                                              religious law, the meaning is completely different
            Except for charitable, the remaining models—      and may be contradictory.
          cultural, economic, and limit models—are not
          as visible as the social and human rights models.      Second, all theologians, regardless of their
          Under the cultural model, disability is understood   beliefs, benefit from the nine models discussed
          as a societal norm, which both the disabled and     above. One might wonder what the problem is
          the non-disabled must understand. This model        in a theological scholarship about the logic of
          is an extension of the medical and social model,    specific models. For instance, it is unclear in this
          which fails to recognize the importance of societal   paper how models such as human rights, identity
          norms and beliefs. However, cultural model is not   formation, and the social model could contradict
          widely used since religious and social models are   with the teachings of a particular religion. This
          seen as more important.                             might be because it is outside the paper’s scope.
                                                              Nevertheless, any serious readers would certainly
            The charitable model is obvious since society     be interested in this subject, hence even a small
          must take action to help and protect the            clue would have been helpful.
          disabled groups. This model is adopted by many
          governments. Although disability is seen as a          Overall, it is a highly intriguing and instructive
          burden by society, this model benefits many poor    paper, with the nine models serving as a
          and disabled individuals.                           framework for conducting a countrywide survey
                                                              on how disabled and non-disabled people perceive
            The economic model is rather straightforward.     disability.
          It uses the cost-benefit analysis to determine
          how the disabled may contribute to economic
          development. Although legislations are created
          to provide equal employment opportunities for
          persons with disabilities, the calculation of profits
          and losses is always a factor for any form of
          decision-making.

            The final model is the limit model. This model
          carries a religious undertone. Its major point is
          that everyone is differently abled and differently
          disabled. Everyone may be capable in certain areas
          yet may have limits in others. Indeed, disability
          might be a limitation, but all disabled persons have
          something that abled persons do not.


            I have two comments to make based on the
          discussions. Firstly, since the article is targeted
          towards religious groups, “moral” and “religious”
          are assumed to be synonymous. In popular
          tradition, the logic of law is understood to follow
          three degrees of hierarchy.  God’s Law (revelations)
          is the highest degree, Positive Law (man-made
          law) is the lowest, and Natural Law (God-made
          law) is somewhere in between. While the notion of




                                                                          Vol. 01, Issue 2 | February 2023  22
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28