Page 94 - 24107
P. 94

Lech Lecha



                               tOldOt תֹד ְל ֹו ּ ת                                                                 £Why God Took Abraham Outside Why God Took Abraham Outside Why God Took Abraham Outside Why God Took Abraham Outside Why God Took Abraham Outside Why God Took Abraham Outside
                                                                                                                    ££££



                                                                                                          As mentioned in the introduction, the Rabbis coined the term PaRDeS
                                                                                                          (סדרפ) – an acronym literally meaning orchard – to refer to their four-
                             £The Secret of Inter-Inclusion£The Secret of Inter-InclusionThe Secret of Inter-Inclusion  tiered  system  of biblical interpretation, which  revealed  that each
                                                                                                          word, verse, story, and mitzvah in the Torah could be simultaneously
                             £
                                                                                                          understood on four different levels. By systematically applying these
                                                                                                          four approaches to interpreting the biblical text, many important
               Toldot’s opening verse reads, “And these are the children of Isaac the                     insights are arrived at.
               son of Abraham; Abraham gave birth to Isaac” (Genesis 25:19). From
               time immemorial,  the commentators have questioned this verse’s                              Rashi is best known for his lucid and deeply insightful commentary
               redundancy: having told us that Isaac is Abraham’s son, why does the                       on the Torah, which  reveals the  peshat level,  the straightforward
               verse go on to state that Abraham gave birth to Isaac? The Sages have                      or literal meaning of the text. Yet upon closer investigation we see
               taught us that such a redundancy in the Torah must come to teach us                        that in many cases Rashi relies on Midrashic sources to arrive at his
               something we might not have realized or understood without it.                             straightforward readings. These sources approach the text from a
                                                                                                          derash level, using allegorical and homiletical tools to decipher the
                 Rashi explains this redundancy in two ways. Firstly, by repeating                        text. In addition, many times Rashi explains the peshat by searching
               Abraham’s name twice,  the  verse  is hinting that only Abraham,                           for meanings that are primarily alluded to (remez) in the text. It is
               and not Abram, could father a son like Isaac worthy of carrying on                         therefore more accurate to say that Rashi’s explanation of the text is
               the family traditions. This explanation is based on the premise that                       drawn from all strata of learning, yet he is always primarily focused
               when God added the letter heh to Abram’s name, his entire being was                        on elucidating the peshat of the text. Indeed, Rashi himself describes
               qualitatively transformed. Secondly, Rashi offers a Midrashic reading                      his approach  this way:  “I  am  only  concerned with the Torah’s
               explaining why Abraham’s paternity had to be stressed. The “scoffers                       straightforward [or literal] interpretation and with those aggadot [a
               of the generation” argued that Isaac was Abimelech’s son, for Sarah                        form of Midrash] that explain the words of the Torah in a fitting
               only managed to conceive shortly after being taken by Abimelech                            manner” (Rashi on Genesis 3:8).
               (Genesis 20:1-18). The Midrash explains that the verse stresses that
               “Abraham gave birth to Isaac” to teach us that God made Isaac look                           Usually Rashi provides one explanation for each point he chooses
               exactly like Abraham in order to dispel the notion that Isaac was only                     to elucidate. On occasion he will add another explanation or tradition,
               raised as his son, but was not biologically his own.                                       and on rare occasions  he will offer  even more interpretations. In
                                                                                                          this week’s  portion  we have a beautiful example of  how Rashi’s
                 In addition to these insights, this verse also contains deeper spiritual                 commentary employs all four  levels of  the  PaRDeS system in
               and mystical allusions. Abraham was naturally an extrovert, the                            interpreting a specific verse: “And He took him [Abraham] outside
               epitome – or in Kabbalistic terminology, the “chariot” or vehicle –                        and said: ‘Look now towards the  heavens  and count the  stars if
               of chesed (loving-kindness), of expansiveness, and of giving. Isaac                        you are able to count them. And He said to him: So will be your
               was just the opposite; he was the “chariot” of gevurah (strength), an                      offspring!”  (Genesis 15:5).  This  verse  describes  God’s reaction to
               attribute manifested by introversion, contraction, and the setting of                      Abraham’s complaint that since he had no children, he would have
               specific boundaries.
                                                                                                          no one to inherit him.

                                                94                                    #                                                                                    24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 3 - B | 18-01-28 | 12:12:04 | SR:-- | Cyan   24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 3 - B | 18-01-28 | 12:12:04 | SR:-- | Black   24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 3 - B | 18-01-28 | 12:12:04 | SR









































































































 # 24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 3 - B | 18-01-28 | 12:12:04 | SR:-- | Magenta  #24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 3 - B | 18-01-28 | 12:12:04 | SR:-- | Yellow  24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 3 - B | 18-01-28 | 12:12:04 | SR:-- | Black  24107-EYAL - 24107-EYAL | 3 - B | 18-01-28 | 12:12:04 | SR:-- | Cyan
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99