Page 298 - MANUAL OF SOP

Determination of Injury Margin

10.13. In a situation where export quantities include some of the PCNs, which
have not been produced by the DI during the POI, the NIP is computed for those
4
PCNs based on closest PCNs, as mentioned in the previous chapter, and this NIP is
subsequently used for determination of injury margin for that PCN.

10.14. It may be clarified that even if the injury margin for certain PCNs is negative,
the overall weighted average injury margin for all the PCNs exported by the
respective Producer Exporter is to be considered for arriving at conclusion regarding
the injury. No exemption or exclusion is allowed for any PCN, merely because a
particular PCN has negative injury margin or dumping margin.

10.15. It is a clear position that dumping margin and injury margin is computed
PCN wise, wherever applicable, for fair and accurate comparison which are kept as
workings in the case file. Further, the weighted averages are calculated and they
form the basis for recommendation of duty.
10.16. The illustration below explains the principles set out above:

S. PCN No. The quantity Quantity NIP Landed Injury Injury
N exported by Pro- produced Value Margin Margin
ducer Exporter by DI %Age
1 ABC 1 50 500 18 12 6 50.00
2 ABC 2 60 350 20 10 10 100.00
3 ABC 3 - 400 28 - 0 0.00
4 ABC 4 15 500 14 16 -2 -12.50
5 ABC 5 40 300 18 13 5 38.46
6 ABC 6 100 250 15 10 5 50.00
7 ABC 7 45 500 14 14 0 0.00
8 ABC 8 100 - 16 (No- 14 2 14.29
tional)
9 ABC 9 80 300 22 23 -1 -4.35
10 Total Qty. 490 3100 18.33 14.00 2.78 19.84
Exported/
AVG
11 Weighted 17.17 13.94 3.45 24.74%
Average

4 Final Finding in anti-dumping investigations on imports of SDH Equipment originating in or exported from China PR
and Israel, F N. 14/2/2009-DGAD dated October 19, 2010.

275