Page 301 - MANUAL OF SOP
P. 301

Manual of OP for Trade Remedy Investigations


               Mid-Term & Sun-Set Review Investigation
               10.21.  Normally the practice in the Directorate is to undertake a comprehensive
               review.In a review investigation in terms of Rule 23, the injury analysis is more
               important for the continuation of duty particularly in the cases where the extension
               is being sought on the likelihood of continuance or recurrence of the injury. NIP is
               calculated for analyzing the effect of underselling as well as to determine whether
               the exports from the subject country to the third country are at prices which are
               otherwise injurious for the Indian DI. Therefore, in the case of review investigations,
               injury analysis takes a higher significance than injury margin itself. Injury Margin is
               needed for computation of injury when duty has to be quantified for revision of the
               duty amount.

               New Shipper Review

               10.22.  New Shipper Review investigation in terms of Rule 22, is filed by the
               producer exporters who had not exported during the period of investigation of
               the original investigation. In such a scenario the injury analysis and injury margin
               is not computed during the investigation. The duty at the end of an investigation
               is determined on the basis of fresh Dumping Margin or the original injury margin
               whichever is less. However, in those cases, where sampling methodology was used
               in case of an original investigation, it can be considered that the duty rates are given
               to the co-operative un-sampled exporter be extended to the NSR applicant with the
               approval of the Authority. Thus no fresh determination of IM is essential in an NSR.

               Anti-Circumvention
               10.23.  The anti-circumvention investigation is to determine the existence and
               effect of any alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping duty levied under section
               9A of the Act. The investigation has to identify the various modes of circumvention
               as provided in Rule 25 of the AD Rules. The Authority upon determination that
               circumvention of anti-dumping duty exists, may recommend imposition of  anti-
               dumping duty to imports of articles found to be circumventing an existing anti-
               dumping duty or to imports of article originating in or exported from countries other
               than those which are already notified for the purpose of levy of the antidumping
               duty (details in Chapter 18). There is no fresh determination of duty in an anti-
               circumvention investigation meaning thereby no fresh IM determination is essential.
               The Authority extends the duty on the PUI, if it concludes that the PUI is being
               exported to India at dumped prices causing injury to the DI. In this scenario, the
               existing duty is extended to cover PUI.





                                                 278
   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306