Page 396 - MANUAL OF SOP
P. 396

Disclosure Statement & Final Finding

               16.54.  In case  of Mid-Term Review Investigation  and Anti-Circumvention
               investigation, the recommendations are co terminus with the validity of duties in
               the original notification.


               APPEAL PROVISION
               16.55.  The last paragraph of the final finding notification, should mention the
               appeal provision.  It should be stated that “an appeal against the order of the
               Central Government arising out a Final Finding shall lie before the Customs, Excise
               and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the Customs Tariff Act”. The
               appeal provision is available pursuant to the decision of Delhi High Court  in those
                                                                                8
              cases also where the Authority recommends termination of investigation.

              TERMINATION OF INVESTIGATION
              16.56.  Rule 14 of the Rules provides as follows:

                     The designated authority shall, by issue of a public notice, terminate an
                     investigation immediately if:
                     (a)    it receives a request in writing for doing so from or on behalf of the
                            domestic industry affected, at whose instance the investigation was
                            initiated;

                     (b)    it is satisfied in the course of an investigation, that there is not
                            sufficient evidence of dumping or, where applicable, injury to justify
                            the continuation of the investigation;

                     (c)    it determines that the margin of dumping is less than two per cent
                            of the export price;
                     (d)    it  determines  that  the  volume  of  the  dumped  imports,  actual  or
                            potential, from a particular country accounts for less than three per
                            cent of the imports of the like product, unless, the countries which
                            individually account for less than three per cent of the imports of the
                            like product, collectively account for more than seven per cent of the
                            import of the like product; or
                     (e)    it determines that the injury where applicable, is negligible.




               8  Jindal Polyfilm Ltd.  v. Designated Authority in W.P. (Civil) No. 8202/2017.




                                                 373
   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401