Page 197 - Hand rearing birds second
P. 197

183











             11

             Flamingos

             Laurie Conrad and Susie Kasielke



               Natural History


             There are six species of flamingo: Greater Flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus), American Flamingo
             (Phoenicopterus  ruber),  Chilean  Flamingo  (Phoenicopterus  chilensis),  Lesser  Flamingo
             (Phoeniconaias  minor),  Andean  Flamingo  (Phoenicoparrus  andinus),  and  Puna  Flamingo
             (Phoenicoparrus jamesi). All have similar natural history characteristics. They feed primarily on
             aquatic invertebrates and algae by filtration, form monogamous pairs, breed in dense colonies of
             thousands to over a million pairs, and are long‐lived. As colonial wading birds, flamingos nest on
             or near water sources and rely on water for building nest mounds of mud and reducing predator
             activity. A single egg is laid atop a volcano‐shaped mound built by the pair. Both the sire and dam
             incubate the egg for 27–30 days and feed the chick with crop milk, produced in the lining of the
             adult crop. In the wild, chicks are reared in crèches, allowing parents to leave the colony to feed
             while a few adults provide “day care.” Chicks fledge at 65–90 days.



             ­ Criteria­for Intervention

             Wild­Colonies
             Rescue of chicks from wild colonies depends on the species, population concerns, likelihood of
             intervention causing additional chicks to become abandoned, and the governmental regulations
             and cultural norms in the affected habitat. Disturbance or water level fluctuations may cause nest
             abandonment, and abandoned flamingo eggs and chicks will not survive without intervention if
             not already part of a crèche. In the right conditions, eggs may hatch days after abandonment leav-
             ing chicks to die on the mound. Legislative issues combined with animal welfare and conflicting
             input from stakeholders may delay intervention while decisions are agreed upon, particularly with
             no disaster management plan. Delays in care lead inevitably to worsening condition and prognosis
             for rescued chicks. It is ideal for wildlife regulatory agencies to have a management plan based on
             possible contingencies in advance, particularly in places where a large breeding area is within an
             urban district or is heavily observed by a concerned public. Intervention that results in rescue of
             hundreds to thousands of chicks requires resources equivalent to a large oil spill, with a manage-
             ment structure to supply knowledgeable and timely decision‐making, sufficient experienced car-
             egivers, and appropriate housing, food supplies, and funding.

             Hand-Rearing Birds, Second Edition. Edited by Rebecca S. Duerr and Laurie J. Gage.
             © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202