Page 60 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training

52 Section I: Diagnostics and Planning

82 Bruhn H, Michaelis T, Merboldt KD et al. On the interpretation of proton NMR 109 McConnell JF, Garosi L, Platt SR. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of pre-
spectra from brain tumours in vivo and in vitro. NMR Biomed 1992;5:253–258. sumed cerebellar cerebrovascular accident in twelve dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound
83 Teresi LM. A Practicing Radiologist Guide to MR Spectroscopy of the Brain. 2005;46:1–10.
Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2007. 110 Garosi L, McConnell JF, Platt SR et al. Clinical and topographic magnetic reso-
84 Vuori K, Kankaanranta L, Hakkinen AM et al. Low‐grade gliomas and focal corti- nance characteristics of suspected brain infarction in 40 dogs. J Vet Intern Med
cal developmental malformations: differentiation with proton MR spectroscopy. 2006;20:311–321.
Radiology 2004;230:703–708. 111 Garosi LS, McConnell JF. Ischaemic stroke in dogs and humans: a comparative
85 McKnight TR, Noworolski SM, Vigneron DB, Nelson SJ. An automated technique review. J Small Anim Pract 2005;46:521–529.
for the quantitative assessment of 3D‐MRSI data from patients with glioma. 112 Garosi L, McConnell JE, Platt SR et al. Results of diagnostic investigations and
J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:167–177. long‐term outcome of 33 dogs with brain infarction (2000–2004). J Vet Intern Med
86 McKnight TR, von dem Bussche MH, Vigneron DB et al. Histopathological vali- 2005;19:725–731.
dation of a three‐dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopy index as a predic- 113 Sutherland‐Smith J, King R, Faissler D, Ruthazer R, Sato A. Magnetic resonance
tor of tumor presence. J Neurosurg 2002;97:794–802. imaging apparent diffusion coefficients for histologically confirmed intracranial
87 Barker PB, Blackband SJ, Chatham JC et al. Quantitative proton spectroscopy and lesions in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52:142–148.
histology of a canine brain tumor model. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:458–464. 114 Kang BT, Jang DP, Gu SH et al. Three‐dimensional time‐of‐flight magnetic reso-
1
88 Gambino JM, Shores A, Haller J et al. In vivo noninvasive single voxel H magnetic nance angiography of intracranial vessels in a canine model of ischemic stroke
resonance spectroscopy at 3T for the evaluation of intracranial neoplasms in the with permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Comp Med
dog [Abstract]. In: Procedings of the American College of Veterinary Radiology, 2009;59:72–77.
Savannah, GA, 2013: 42. Available at https://www.acvr.org/sites/default/ 115 Kang BT, Jang DP, Lee JH et al. Detection of cerebral metabolites in a canine
1
files/2013‐acvr‐proceedings.pdf model of ischemic stroke using H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Res Vet Sci
89 Joslyn S, Sullivan M, Novellas R, Brennan N, Cameron G, Hammond G. Effect of 2009;87:300–306.
delayed acquisition times on gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging 116 Platt SR, Radaelli ST, McDonnell JJ. Computed tomography after mild head
of the presumably normal canine brain. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52:611–618. trauma in dogs. Vet Rec 2002;151:243.
90 Singh JB, Oevermann A, Lang J et al. Contrast media enhancement of intracranial 117 Haley AC, Abramson C. Traumatic pneumocephalus in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc
lesions in magnetic resonance imaging does not reflect histopathologic findings 2009;234:1295–1298.
consistently. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52:619–626. 118 MacKillop E. Magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial malformations in dogs
91 Lee J, Platt S, Kent M, Zhao Q. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameter ratios and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52(1 Suppl 1):S42–S51.
in DCE‐MRI using the reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 119 Davies ES, Volk HA, Behr S et al. Porencephaly and hydranencephaly in six dogs.
2012;30:26–35. Vet Rec 2012;170:179.
92 Zhao Q, Lee S, Kent M, Schatzberg S, Platt S. Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic 120 Schmidt MJ, Klumpp S, Amort K, Jawinski S, Kramer M. Porencephaly in dogs
resonance imaging of canine brain tumors. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:122–129. and cats: magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical signs. Vet Radiol
93 Wolff CA, Holmes SP, Young BD et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the dif- Ultrasound 2012;53:142–149.
ferentiation of neoplastic, inflammatory, and cerebrovascular brain disease in 121 Lamb CR, Croson PJ, Cappello, JCherubini GB. Magnetic resonance imaging
dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2012;26:589–597. findings in 25 dogs with inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid. Vet Radiol Ultrasound
94 Sturges BK, Dickinson PJ, Bollen AW et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and his- 2005;46(1):17–22. Epub 2005/02/08.
tological classification of intracranial meningiomas in 112 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 122 Zakhary R, Keles GE, Berger MS. Intraoperative imaging techniques in the treat-
2008;22:586–595. ment of brain tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 1999;11:152–156.
95 James FM, da Costa RC, Fauber A et al. Clinical and MRI findings in three dogs 123 Lowe LH, Bailey Z. State‐of‐the‐art cranial sonography: Part 1, modern tech-
with polycystic meningiomas. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2012;48:331–338. niques and image interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1028–1033.
96 Cha S. Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. AJNR Am J 124 Roberts DW, Hartov A, Kennedy FE, Miga MI, Paulsen KD. Intraoperative brain
Neuroradiol 2006;27:475–487. shift and deformation: a quantitative analysis of cortical displacement in 28 cases.
97 Wisner ER, Dickinson PJ, Higgins RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging features Neurosurgery 1998;43:749–758; discussion 758–760.
of canine intracranial neoplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52(1 Suppl 1): 125 Daneman A, Epelman M, Blaser S, Jarrin JR. Imaging of the brain in full‐term
S52–S61. neonates: does sonography still play a role? Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:636–646.
98 Freeman AC, Platt SR, Kent M, Hofmeister E. What is the evidence? Diagnosis of 126 Epelman M, Daneman A, Kellenberger CJ et al. Neonatal encephalopathy: a pro-
an intracranial lesion as a meningioma on the basis of MRI characteristics. J Am spective comparison of head US and MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:1640–1650.
Vet Med Assoc 2011;239:60–62. 127 Kane RA, Kruskal JB. Intraoperative ultrasonography of the brain and spine.
99 Cervera V, Mai W, Vite CH, Johnson V, Dayrell‐Hart B, Seiler GS. Comparative Ultrasound Q 2007;23:23–39.
magnetic resonance imaging findings between gliomas and presumed cerebrovas- 128 Moiyadi A, Shetty P. Objective assessment of utility of intraoperative ultrasound
cular accidents in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011;52:33–40. in resection of central nervous system tumors: a cost‐effective tool for intraopera-
100 Rodenas S, Pumarola M, Gaitero L, Zamora A, Anor S. Magnetic resonance imag- tive navigation in neurosurgery. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2011;2:4–11.
ing findings in 40 dogs with histologically confirmed intracranial tumours. Vet J 129 Dohrmann GJ, Rubin JM. Use of ultrasound in neurosurgical operations: a pre-
2011;187:85–91. liminary report. Surg Neurol 1981;16:362–366.
101 Kumar AJ, Leeds NE, Fuller GN et al. Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum 130 Dohrmann GJ, Rubin JM. Dynamic intraoperative imaging and instrumentation
of radiation therapy‐ and chemotherapy‐induced necrosis of the brain after treat- of brain and spinal cord using ultrasound. Neurol Clin 1985;3:425–437.
ment. Radiology 2000;217:377–384. 131 Cengiz C, Keramettin A. Intraoperative ultrasonographic characteristics of malig-
102 Hecht S, Adams WH. MRI of brain disease in veterinary patients. Part 2: Acquired nant intracranial lesions. Neurol India 2005;53:208–211; discussion 212.
brain disorders. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2010;40:39–63. 132 Machi J, Sigel B, Jafar JJ et al. Criteria for using imaging ultrasound during brain
103 Garosi LS, Platt SR, McConnell JF, Wrayt JD, Smith KC. Intracranial haemorrhage and spinal cord surgery. J Ultrasound Med 1984;3:155–161.
associated with Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in three dogs. J Small Anim 133 Sun H, Zhao JZ. Application of intraoperative ultrasound in neurological surgery.
Pract 2005;46:93–99. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007;50:155–159.
104 Cooper JJ, Young BD, Hoffman A et al. Intracranial magnetic resonance imaging arti- 134 Erdogan N, Tucer B, Mavili E, Menku A, Kurtsoy A. Ultrasound guidance in
facts and pseudolesions in dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound intracranial tumor resection: correlation with postoperative magnetic resonance
2010;51:587–595. findings. Acta Radiol 2005;46:743–749.
105 Garosi LS. Cerebrovascular disease in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small 135 Renner C, Lindner D, Schneider JP, Meixensberger J. Evaluation of intra‐operative
Anim Pract 2010;40:65–79. ultrasound imaging in brain tumor resection: a prospective study. Neurol Res
106 Kang BT, Jang DP, Gu SH et al. MRI features in a canine model of ischemic stroke: 2005;27:351–357.
correlation between lesion volume and neurobehavioral status during the suba- 136 Ray WZ, Barua M, Ryken TC. Anatomic visualization with ultrasound‐assisted
cute stage. Comp Med 2009;59:459–464. intracranial image guidance in neurosurgery: a report of 30 patients. J Am Coll
107 Platt SR, Garosi L. Canine cerebrovascular disease: do dogs have strokes? J Am Surg 2004;199:338–343.
Anim Hosp Assoc 2003;39:337–342. 137 Unsgaard G, Gronningsaeter A, Ommedal S, Nagelhus Hernes TA. Brain opera-
108 Goncalves R, Carrera I, Garosi L, Smith PM, Fraser McConnell J, Penderis J. tions guided by real‐time two‐dimensional ultrasound: new possibilities as a
Clinical and topographic magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of suspected result of improved image quality. Neurosurgery 2002;51:402–411; discussion
thalamic infarcts in 16 dogs. Vet J 2011;188:39–43. 411–412.