Page 61 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 61

Chapter 4: Advanced Imaging: Intracranial Surgery  53

               138  Unsgaard G, Ommedal S, Muller T, Gronningsaeter A, Nagelhus Hernes TA.   150  Engelhardt M, Hansen C, Eyding J et  al. Feasibility of contrast‐enhanced
                  Neuronavigation by intraoperative three‐dimensional ultrasound: initial  experience   sonography during resection of cerebral tumours: initial results of a prospective
                  during brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 2002;50:804–812;  discussion 812.  study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33:571–575.
               139  Rubin JM, Dohrmann GJ. Efficacy of intraoperative US for evaluating intracranial   151  He W, Jiang XQ, Wang S et al. Intraoperative contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for
                  masses. Radiology 1985;157:509–511.                brain tumors. Clin Imaging 2008;32:419–424.
               140  Rubin JM, Dohrmann GJ. Use of ultrasonically guided probes and catheters in   152  Kanno H, Ozawa Y, Sakata K et al. Intraoperative power Doppler ultrasonography
                  neurosurgery. Surg Neurol 1982;18:143–148.         with a contrast‐enhancing agent for intracranial tumors.  J Neurosurg
               141  Andrews  BT,  Bederson  JB,  Pitts  LH.  Use  of  intraoperative  ultrasonography  to   2005;102:295–301.
                  improve the diagnostic accuracy of exploratory burr holes in patients with trau-  153  Letteboer MM, Willems PW, Viergever MA, Niessen WJ. Brain shift estimation in
                  matic tentorial herniation. Neurosurgery 1989;24:345–347.  image‐guided neurosurgery using 3‐D ultrasound.  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
               142  Kumar P, Sukthankar R, Damany BJ, Mishra J, Jha AN. Evaluation of intraoperative   2005;52:268–276.
                  ultrasound in neurosurgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1993;22(3 Suppl):422–427.  154  Shores A, Holland M, Hudson J et al. Intraoperative ultrasound for intracranial
               143  Hatfield MK, Rubin JM, Gebarski SS, Silbergleit R. Intraoperative sonography in   surgery. In: Proceedings of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
                  low‐grade gliomas. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8:131–134.  Forum 2012. Available at http://www.vin.com/acvim/2012/Default.htm
               144  Le Roux PD, Berger MS, Wang K, Mack LA, Ojemann GA. Low grade gliomas:   155  Flegel T, Podell M, March PA, Chakeres DW. Use of a disposable real‐time CT
                  comparison of intraoperative ultrasound characteristics with preoperative imag-  stereotactic navigator device for minimally invasive dog brain biopsy through a
                  ing studies. J Neurooncol 1992;13:189–198.         mini‐burr hole. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1160–1163.
               145  van Velthoven V. Intraoperative ultrasound imaging: comparison of pathomor-  156  Giroux A, Jones JC, Bohn JH, Duncan RB, Waldron DR, Inzana KR. A new device
                  phological findings in US versus CT, MRI and intraoperative findings.  Acta   for stereotactic CT‐guided biopsy of the canine brain: design, construction, and
                  Neurochir Suppl 2003;85:95–99.                     needle placement accuracy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002;43:229–236.
               146  Chacko AG, Kumar NK, Chacko G, Athyal R, Rajshekhar V. Intraoperative ultrasound   157  Moissonnier P, Blot S, Devauchelle P et al. Stereotactic CT‐guided brain biopsy in
                  in determining the extent of resection of parenchymal brain tumours: a compara-  the dog. J Small Anim Pract 2002;43:115–123.
                  tive study with computed tomography and histopathology.  Acta Neurochir   158  Moissonnier P, Bordeau W, Delisle F, Devauchelle P. Accuracy testing of a new
                  2003;145:743–748; discussion 748.                  stereotactic  CT‐guided brain  biopsy  device  in  the  dog.  Res  Vet  Sci
               147  Hammoud MA, Ligon BL, el Souki R, Shi WM, Schomer DF, Sawaya R. Use of intra-  2000;68:243–247.
                  operative ultrasound for localizing tumors and determining the extent of resection: a   159  Koblik PD, LeCouteur RA, Higgins RJ et al. CT‐guided brain biopsy using a modi-
                  comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996;84:737–741.  fied Pelorus Mark III stereotactic system: experience with 50 dogs. Vet Radiol
               148  LeRoux PD, Berger MS, Ojemann GA, Wang K, Mack LA. Correlation of intraoperative   Ultrasound 1999;40:434–440.
                  ultrasound tumor volumes and margins with preoperative computerized tomogra-  160  Koblik PD, LeCouteur RA, Higgins RJ et al. Modification and application of a
                  phy scans. An intraoperative method to enhance tumor resection. J Neurosurg   Pelorus Mark III stereotactic system for CT‐guided brain biopsy in 50 dogs. Vet
                  1989;71:691–698.                                   Radiol Ultrasound 1999;40:424–433.
               149  LeRoux PD, Winter TC, Berger MS, Mack LA, Wang K, Elliott JP. A comparison   161  Chen AV, Wininger FA, Frey S et al. Description and validation of a magnetic reso-
                  between preoperative magnetic resonance and intraoperative ultrasound tumor   nance imaging‐guided stereotactic brain biopsy device in the dog.  Vet  Radiol
                  volumes and margins. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:29–36.  Ultrasound 2012;53:150–156.
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66