Page 176 - Basic Monitoring in Canine and Feline Emergency Patients
P. 176

Table 8.5.  Continued.

  VetBooks.ir  concentration of sodium can be administered instead (lactated Ringer’s solution, Plasmalyte, 0.9% saline) to slow the rate of sodium
             decline.
             With ACUTE hypernatremia, sodium levels can be corrected quickly with high fluid rates (i.e. if you know the abnormality occurred
             c within the last 8 hours, you can correct it within the next 8 hours).
             When replacing sodium levels in CHRONIC hyponatremia (>24–48 hours), sodium levels should not increase at a rate faster than
             0.5–1.0 mEq/L/h to avoid dehydrating the cells of the brain by increasing the osmolality of the blood too quickly (and drawing water
             out of the brain cells into the bloodstream). As with hypernatremia, sodium levels are typically checked every 4-6 hours to monitor the
             rate of the sodium increase and adjust the fluid rates accordingly.
             With ACUTE hyponatremia, the sodium levels can be corrected as quickly as they occurred without concern.
            8.5  Pitfalls of the Monitor                 present in the approximately 7% of the blood
                                                         occupied by proteins and lipids. However, flame
            In general, electrolyte monitoring (whether done on   photometric techniques report the amount of
            a point-of-care instrument or a laboratory-based   sodium per  total volume of sample. Because the
            machine) is widely performed and time tested.   lipid and protein component is usually fairly
            Many publications have compared a variety of   small, for most samples this does not significantly
            point-of-care instruments versus laboratory-based   affect the measured value. However, if the protein
            instrumentation in humans and various animal spe-  or lipid content of the blood is significantly
            cies. Electrolyte testing (Na, K, iCa) has high agree-  greater than 7%, there will be a much smaller
            ment between the two types of instrumentation in   proportion of the sample which is aqueous from
            dogs and cats.                               which to derive the sodium content.  Therefore,
              As with any laboratory machine, quality control   when the sodium value is compared to the total
            and calibration should be performed per the instruc-  sample volume (which is higher because of the
            tions included with that instrument. Many of  the   lipemia  and/or  hyperproteinemia),  the  sodium
            point-of-care instruments do internal calibration   concentration will be falsely lowered.  This is
            and quality control. For example, an i-STAT system   termed pseudohyponatremia.
            performs  internal  electronic  simulation  several   Typically, if lipid is causing pseuohyponatremia,
            times daily on its own to ensure viability of the ion-  the lipid is visible to the naked eye in the blood
            specific electrodes and notifies the operator with a   sample. Generally, 1  mg/dL of serum triglyceride
            warning message if the internal electronic simula-  reduces the sodium by 0.002  mEq/L so large
            tion fails. Most point-of-care instruments still rec-  amounts of triglyceride are required to significantly
            ommend periodic intermittent operator calibration.   alter  sodium  concentrations.  Similarly,  patients
            When point-of-care instruments use cartridges to   with dramatic enough hyperproteinemia to affect
            effect electrolyte measurement, calibration is done   laboratory results usually have viscous plasma. For
            automatically when the cartridges are inserted into   hyperproteinemic cases, each 1 g/dL of protein above
            the machine. In most cases, the manufacturer does   the level of 8 g/dL reduces the sodium concentra-
            not suggest that cartridges in a lot or box be   tion by 0.25 mEq/L.
            checked against controls as long as cartridges are   When using ISE testing (whether it be a point-
            stored within the temperature limits, used within   of-care analyzer or a laboratory machine), hyper-
            the expiration dates, and otherwise handled accord-  lipidemia and hyperproteinemia generally do not
            ing to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Some   alter sodium measurements unless there are large
            laboratories will independently test the cartridges   changes in lipid levels (typically triglyceride levels
            according to protocols dictated by individual   greater than 650 mg/dL), since the concentration
            institutions.
                                                         of sodium is measured directly rather than versus
                                                         the volume of the plasma. However, inappropriate
                                                         dilution of the sample with anticoagulant or intra-
            Sodium
                                                         venous (IV) fluid contamination can alter results.
            The biggest interference with  flame photometric   Anticoagulant dilution occurs when too little
            testing of sodium occurs when there is excessive   blood is added to a tube containing sodium hepa-
            lipemia or hyperproteinemia. Sodium is present in   rin anticoagulant. The ‘extra’ sodium heparin that
            the aqueous portion of a blood sample (usually   is unbound to blood will falsely elevate the
            about 93% of the sample in health), but is not   sodium. Similarly, if a patient is receiving sodium


             168                                                                     E.J. Thomovsky
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181