Page 635 - Hand rearing birds second
P. 635

636  Hand-Rearing Birds

            (McGraw 2004). Thus, there are still many questions remaining about the optimal level and type of
            carotenoid that should be provided to chicks. Sources of dietary carotenoids include insects (natu-
            rally enriched, or enriched via their feeding and/or gut-loading; Ogilvy et al. 2012; Finke 2015b),
            produce items, or commercial supplemental forms (e.g. marigold extract, a source of the yellow
            pigments lutein and zeaxanthin or canthaxanthin, a source of red pigmentation). Again, further
            research is needed to characterize the optimal level of these pigments in avian diets, but the risk of
            toxicity from these compounds is low.
              As mentioned previously, it has also been suggested that the preference of Blue Tits (P. caeruleus)
            for spiders during their nesting season may be due to their high levels of taurine (Ramsay and
            Houston 2003). Supplementing the diet of wild Blue Tit nestlings from 2 to 12 days of age with
            taurine resulted in juveniles that took significantly greater risks when investigating novel objects
            and were more successful at a spatial learning task than controls (Arnold et al. 2007). Adult insects
            and commercial cat/kitten foods are rich sources of taurine, while insect larvae and vegetable
            protein-based commercial products (unless supplemented) would typically contain little taurine.


              Conclusions


            It is crucial to note that animals require nutrients and appropriate substrates to deliver those
            nutrients, as opposed to specific diet ingredients. Thus, it is completely reasonable that insect-
            substitute diets may serve as a complete diet item in a facility. Alternatively, commercially-avail-
            able insects with appropriate supplementation may be more appropriate for a particular situation.
            There are several options for feeding insectivorous nestling birds in rehabilitation settings. Each
            comes with pros and cons, and institutions should determine what feeding program(s) best meet
            their needs with regard to chick success, resource allocation (human and monetary), and availa-
            bility of food items. It is likely that more than one option is optimal within an institution. Care
            should be taken to document feeding programs, such that educated decisions about modifications
            can be made for future improvements to protocols. Additionally, when utilizing recipes for insect
            supplementation  or  for  insect-substitute  diets,  it  is  critical  to  follow  recipes  precisely  or  the
            intended nutritional profile may not be achieved. Ideally, nutrients are provided to chicks in a
            way that is appropriate to their digestive physiology, nutrient needs for development of robust
            immunity, skeleto-muscular systems, and neurological functions to provide optimal chances of
            success post-fledging and release.


              References

            Arnold, K.E., Ramsay, S.L., Donaldson, C., and Adam, A. (2007). Parental prey selection affects
              risk-taking behaviour and spatial learning in avian offspring. Proceedings of the Biological Society B
              274: 2563–2569.
            Aschoff, J. and Pohl, H. (1970). Rhythmic variations in energy metabolism. Federation Proceedings 29
              (4): 1541–1552.
            Barker, D., Fitzpatrick, M.P., and Dierenfeld, E.S. (1998). Nutrient composition of selected whole
              invertebrates. Zoo Biology 17: 123–134.
            Bartholomew, G.A. and Cade, T.J. (1963). The water economy of land birds. The Auk 80 (4): 504–539.
            Bernard J.B. and Allen M.E. (1997). Feeding captive insectivorous animals: nutritional aspects of
              insects as food. https://nagonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/NAG-FS003-97-Insects-
              JONI-FEB-24-2002-MODIFIED.pdf.
   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640