Page 116 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 116

88     PART I   Cardiovascular System Disorders


            diagnostic evaluation, because most cases have been associ-   BOX 4.4
            ated with HCM. Complete AV block occasionally is found in
  VetBooks.ir  older cats without detectable organic heart disease.  Formulas to Calculate Constant-Rate Infusion
              Type I second-degree AV block and first-degree AV block
                                                                  Method 1
            are associated frequently with high vagal tone or drug effects
            in dogs. These animals often are asymptomatic; exercise or   (Allows for “fine-tuning” fluid and drug administration
            anticholinergic drug (atropine or glycopyrrolate) adminis-  rate)
            tration usually abolishes the conduction disturbance. High-  Determine desired drug infusion rate: µg/kg/min × kg
            grade second-degree AV block (many blocked P waves) and   body weight = µg/min (A)
            complete (3°) heart block usually cause lethargy, exercise   Determine desired fluid infusion rate: mL/hour ÷ 60 =
                                                                    mL/min (B)
            intolerance, weakness, syncope, and other signs of low   (A) ÷ (B) = µg/min ÷ mL/min = µg drug/mL of fluid
            cardiac output. These signs become severe at heart rates con-  Convert from µg to mg of drug needed (1 µg =
            sistently below 40 beats/min in dogs. CHF develops second-  0.001 mg)
            ary to chronic bradycardia in some cases, especially if other   Mg drug/mL fluid × mL of fluid in bag (or bottle, etc.) =
            cardiac disease is present.                             mg of drug to add to the fluid container
              An atropine challenge test (p. 97) is used to determine the
            degree of vagal influence on the AV block. Oral anticholin-  Method 2
            ergic (or sympathomimetic) therapy can be attempted in   (For total dose over a 6-hour period, must also calculate
            symptomatic animals that are atropine-responsive (see Fig.   fluid volume and administration rate)
            4.5). However, atropine and oral anticholinergic therapy   Total dose in mg to infuse over a 6-hour period = body
            often is ineffective, especially with high-grade second-degree   weight (kg) × dose (µg/kg/min) × 0.36
            AV block, so artificial pacing usually is indicated. An emer-  Method 3 (for Lidocaine)
            gency infusion of dopamine (see Box 3.1) or isoproterenol   (Faster but less helpful if fluid rate is important or if fine
            might increase the ventricular escape rate in animals with   drug-dosage adjustments are necessary)
            high-grade second- or third-degree block, although it may   For CRI of 44 µg/kg/min of lidocaine, add 25 mL of 2%
            also provoke ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Oral isoprotere-  lidocaine to 250 mL of D 5 W
            nol usually is ineffective. A thorough cardiac workup is indi-  Infuse at 0.25 mL/25 lb of body weight/min
            cated before permanent artificial pacemaker implantation
            because some underlying diseases (progressive myocardial
            disease, endocarditis) are associated with a poor prognosis,
            even after pacing. Temporary transvenous pacing could be   antagonists (β-blockers), which act by inhibiting the effects
            attempted for 1 to 2 days in questionable cases to assess the   of catecholamines on the heart. Class III drugs prolong the
            animal’s response to a normal heart rate before permanent   effective refractory period of cardiac action potentials
            pacemaker surgery is performed. More information on   without decreasing conduction velocity; they may be most
            pacing therapy is found in Suggested Readings.       effective  in  suppressing  reentrant  arrhythmias  and  in  pre-
                                                                 venting VF. Class IV drugs are the calcium entry blockers;
                                                                 ventricular arrhythmias usually are not responsive to these
            ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENTS                                agents,  but they are  important  against supraventricular
                                                                 tachyarrhythmias. Antiarrhythmic agents within this classi-
            Antiarrhythmic drugs can act by slowing the rate of a tachy-  fication scheme are contraindicated in animals with com-
            cardia, terminating a reentrant arrhythmia, or preventing   plete AV block and should be used only cautiously in animals
            abnormal impulse formation or conduction. These effects   with sinus bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome, and first- or
            occur  through  modulation  of  tissue  electrophysiologic    second-degree AV block. Sometimes a designation of Class
            properties and/or autonomic  nervous  system  effects.  The   V is used for drugs with antiarrhythmic effects that work by
            traditional (Vaughan-Williams) antiarrhythmic drugs are   other mechanisms than described for the original four
            classified according to their main electrophysiologic effects   classes.
            on cardiac cell action potentials (Table 4.1). Although this
            classification system has several shortcomings (for example,   CLASS I ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS
                                                                                                        +
            some drugs with antiarrhythmic effects are excluded, several   Class I antiarrhythmic drugs block membrane Na  channels
            drugs have the multiclass effects, and attention to ion channel   and depress the action potential upstroke (phase 0), which
            mechanisms is lacking), clinical reference to this classifica-  slows conduction velocity along the cardiac cells. They have
            tion persists. See Table 4.2 and Box 4.4 for antiarrhythmic   been subclassified according to differences in other electro-
            drug dosages and CRI calculation methods.            physiologic characteristics. These differences (see Table 4.1)
              Class I agents tend to slow conduction and decrease auto-  can influence their efficacy against specific arrhythmias.
                                                                                                            +
            maticity and excitability by means of their membrane-  Most of the class I agents depend on extracellular K  con-
            stabilizing effects; older ventricular antiarrhythmic drugs   centration for their effects, and they lose effectiveness in
            belong to this class. Class II drugs include the β-adrenergic   patients with hypokalemia.
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121