Page 486 - The Veterinary Laboratory and Field Manual 3rd Edition
P. 486

Wildlife health and disease surveillance  423


                stems from several practical and logistical chal-  Such data are potentially valuable long into the
                lenges. Some of the ‘special problems’ that limit   future.
                the detection of diseases in wildlife include, for   There are, however, issues and biases to
                example, difficulties in defining and achieving   consider when relying solely on passive surveil-
                an adequate sample size, selection bias in the   lance for disease identification in wild animals.
                sampling methods, difficulty in obtaining good   For example, in the wild, carcasses of dead ani-
                quality samples and measurement bias in the   mals tend to be removed or cached by scavengers
                diagnostic tests used (that is, lack of validated   very quickly (within hours as opposed to days).
                tests for wild species).                 This means that passive surveillance is likely
                  Wildlife surveillance can be conceived as a   to detect only a fraction of the total individu-
                designed survey (active or targeted surveillance),   als that have died from a disease, if any at all
                for example, with the objective of identifying one   (that is, in the case of small-sized species and
                or more diseases and/or understanding disease   carcasses in remote/sparsely populated regions).
                prevalence. This relies on the active collection   Additionally, larger or more charismatic animals
                and analyses of data and biological samples   that are found dead are more likely to be reported
                from live and/or dead animals (for example, by   than other species. Conversely, there are rare
                capturing live animals, by obtaining samples   cases in which passive surveillance might lead
                from harvested animals or through field disease   to overestimation of certain diseases. For exam-
                investigation activities). In local and traditional   ple, rabid animals are less likely to avoid danger
                knowledge systems, participatory epidemiol-  and have greater risk of being killed by vehicles.
                ogy (PE) tools can be also used as a form of   The prevalence of rabies in road-killed animals
                disease surveillance. In PE, the epidemiological   might, therefore, be higher than the prevalence
                intelligence on wildlife populations, including   of rabies in the general wildlife population of an
                population health status and the presence of dis-  area. Selection bias and measurement bias both
                eases, is gathered in the form of ethnoveterinary   need to be carefully considered during analyses
                knowledge by interviewing key informants (for   of wildlife data from passive or active surveil-
                example, hunters, trappers). This process relies   lance. For more information, refer to Wobeser
                on the use of participatory tools that allow for   (2007) in the bibliography.
                both qualitative and quantitative assessments   The design of a wildlife disease survey will
                (see example in section 11.3).           depend on the disease to be studied, the expected
                  More commonly, wildlife health and disease   prevalence of the suspected disease in the targeted
                surveillance relies on routine reporting, as opposed   population and the size of the population(s) to
                to the active investigation, of disease. This is   be sampled. The principles of survey design are
                called passive surveillance (also known as general   well outlined in various textbooks but it is prefer-
                or scanning surveillance). For example, an animal   able to discuss any intended survey programme
                is found dead and is submitted to a central labora-  with a statistician, veterinary epidemiologist and
                tory where standardized necropsy, examination of   other professionals, as well as the laboratories
                samples and testing are carried out. A diagnosis or   involved in the testing of the samples. When PE
                suspected diagnosis is determined and a detailed   tools can be applied, the expected prevalence of
                report is written, which is then usually entered   the targeted disease(s) can be estimated through
                into a database. Epidemiologists and others can   participatory techniques and the data used for
                access the central database to generate informa-  sample size calculations.
                tion on characteristics, occurrences and patterns   When collecting biological samples and data
                of disease at local or larger geographical scales.   from live wild animals, it is necessary to work







       Vet Lab.indb   423                                                                  26/03/2019   10:26
   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491