Page 164 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 164

130   Chapter 2


              The most direct observational sign of hindlimb lame­  classification, this can be called an  “impact”‐type
            ness is asymmetric vertical movement of the entire pos­  hindlimb lameness.
  VetBooks.ir  mass on a long lever arm projecting out of the hindquar­  horse pushes off less, causing the pelvis to rise less,
                                                                  When pain is greatest in the second half of stance, the
            terior end (pelvis) of the horse. The horse has no large
                                                               resulting in a difference in the high positions of the pel­
            ters, so the simple mechanism achieved by altering head
            movement to adjust forelimb weight‐bearing is not   vis (Figure 2.121). It is lower after lame limb pushoff.
            available to the horse  with hindlimb lameness. Other   For purposes of classification, this can be referred to as
            adjustments must be performed. To decrease force on   a “pushoff”‐type hindlimb lameness.
            the hindlimbs, the pelvis either falls less (like dropping a   Hindlimb lameness can be both impact and pushoff,
            ball from a lower height), if the pain is greatest in the   which becomes more common as hindlimb lameness
            first half of stance, or rises less, from decreased hindlimb   increases in severity. Hindlimb lameness can also be
            vertical propulsion, if pain is greatest during the second   impact on one side and pushoff on the other, a bilateral
            half of stance. As the severity of hindlimb abnormality   lameness, but this is not common. Unlike forelimb lame­
            increases, both decreased fall and decreased rise (impact   ness, where at moderate speeds most lameness is of the
            and pushoff lameness) are seen. The adjustments made   impact  type,  for  hindlimb  lameness  a  predominant
            by the horse to decrease fall and to decrease rise of the   impact‐ or pushoff‐type lameness occur with approxi­
            pelvis are different.                              mate equal frequency.  This is probably because the
              Decreased fall of the pelvis results in a difference   hindlimb acts as both a propulsive force during pushoff
            in low positions of the pelvis near midstance, lower   and a braking force during impact even at moderate
            (i.e. closer to the ground) on the not lame or less lame   speed of movement.  There is objective evidence that
            hindlimb, if the pain is primarily in the first half   impact and pushoff hindlimb lameness have different
            of  hindlimb  stance  (Figure  2.120).  For  purposes  of   vertical and horizontal ground reaction force profiles.
                                                                                                               6


                                            A                        C


                                                        B

                                      Diff Min Pelvis
                                                                                     D


                                                   Lame limb stance

            Figure 2.120.  Overall vertical pelvis trajectory pattern for horse   beginning of stance of the left hindlimb) is zero. Lowest pelvic
            with impact‐type hindlimb lameness or lameness with pain greatest   position occurs during stance of the not or less lame hindlimb. Diff
            in the first half of hindlimb stance. Peak (maximum) vertical pelvic   Min Pelvis or first minimum pelvic height (B: during stance of the
            position before right and left hindlimb stance is the same. Diff Max   right hindlimb) minus second minimum pelvis height (D: during
            Pelvis or first maximum pelvis height (A: near beginning of stance of   stance of the left hindlimb) is a positive value for right hindlimb
            the right hindlimb) minus second maximum pelvic height (C: near   lameness (and a negative value for left hindlimb lameness).

                                                                                D
                                 Diff Max Pelvis    B



                                                                            Pushoff of
                                                                            left hind limb
                                     A         Pushoff of          C
                                               right hind limb





                                                           Lame limb stance
            Figure 2.121.  Overall vertical pelvis trajectory pattern for horse   maximum pelvis (near beginning of stance of the right hindlimb, D)
            with pushoff‐type right hindlimb lameness or lameness with pain   minus second maximum pelvic height (B: near beginning of stance of
            greatest in the second half of right hindlimb stance. Peak (maximum)   the left hindlimb) is positive. Lowest pelvic position occurs during
            vertical pelvic position after pushoff of left hindlimb (D: before impact   stance of right and left hindlimbs. Diff Min Pelvis or first minimum
            of right hindlimb) is greater than vertical pelvic position after pushoff of   pelvic height (A: during stance of the right hindlimb) minus second
            right hindlimb (B: before impact of left hindlimb). Diff Max Pelvis or first   minimum pelvis height (C: during stance of the left hindlimb) is zero.
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169